Skip to content
Tax Law Center Blog

Tax Law Center Blog

  • Tax & Foreign Assets
    • Tax Law Services
    • Foreign Asset Planning
  • About
  • Contact Us
Close Button

IRS Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Programs Continue to Burden “Benign Actors” and Damage IRS Credibility

23 July, 2013 Parag Patel 0 Comments 1 category

Parag P. Patel, Esq.By Parag P. Patel, Esq. | Updated July 23, 2013

The Taxpayer advocate has issued a new mid-year 2013 report. The portion that relates to the IRS’s OVDI/P initiatives is posted below (footnotes and tables omitted).

The IRS offered a series of offshore voluntary disclosure (OVD) programs to settle with taxpayers who had failed to report offshore income and file one or more related information returns (e.g ., Form TD F 90–22 .1, Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (FBAR)) .

As described in prior reports, these programs apply a one-size fits-all approach designed for “bad actors” to “benign actors” who inadvertently violated the rules, requiring them to opt-in and then optout, and subjecting them to lengthy examinations and draconian civil and criminal penalties. In addition to criminal penalties, the maximum civil penalty for “willfully” failing to report foreign accounts on an FBAR is severe – the greater of 50 percent of the account or $100,000 per year.

A Government Accountability Office (GAO) analysis shows that the offshore penalty paid by those with the smallest accounts (i.e., those in the 10th percentile with accounts of $78,315) was disproportionate – at least 575 percent of the tax, interest, and penalties on their unreported income.

It was also disproportionately greater than the amount paid by those with the largest accounts (i.e., those in the 90th percentile with accounts of more than $4 million) who paid 86 percent or less.

Moreover, the IRS initially processed applications from benign actors who are expected to opt out much more slowly than others, though it has recently begun to process them more quickly.

In 2012, the IRS began allowing certain “low risk,” nonresident nonfilers – those with simple returns and owing less than $1,500 in tax – to file the returns without triggering penalties (the “Streamlined Nonresident Filing Initiative”). In January 2013, following the National Taxpayer Advocate Service’s (TAS) recommendation to expand the Streamlined Nonresident Filing Initiative to both U.S. residents and those owing more than $1,500, IRS officials publicly announced the IRS had eliminated the $1,500 threshold.

Although this is a positive change, the National Taxpayer Advocate remains concerned that the IRS does not have a simple and easy method for allowing benign actors who are U.S. residents to resolve past filing delinquencies. Nor has it provided clear guidance about key terms that it has used in its programs, such as when someone will be considered “high risk,” how they may avoid a penalty (e.g., by demonstrating “reasonable cause”), and when they will be subject to the lower penalty applicable to “nonwillful” conduct . The uncertainty surrounding these terms and the consequences of opting out has likely prompted some benign actors to pay more than they should inside the OVD programs.

In addition, the IRS has reportedly revoked pre-clearance letters authorizing taxpayers to participate in the OVDP, even though some had already made disclosures, filed returns, and paid taxes and penalties in reliance on the IRS’s letters.

These reversals further erode the IRS’s credibility, and are more likely to reduce than to increase voluntary compliance. Moreover, the IRS has not adopted the National Taxpayer Advocate’s recommendation that IRS send notices to educate those with foreign accounts about the requirements. Nor has it addressed the unnecessarily burdensome requirement to report certain accounts on both Form 8938 and the FBAR.

Finally, in FY 2012 and FY 2013 YTD, TAS assisted 474 taxpayers with OVD-related problems and issued four taxpayer assistance orders (TAOs). In the three cases in which the IRS did not comply with the TAOs, the National Taxpayer Advocate elevated (or plans to elevate) them to the Operating Division Commissioner level or above.

In FY 2014, TAS will continue to advocate for taxpayers experiencing problems with the IRS’s OVD programs. In addition, TAS will advocate for the IRS to stop unnecessarily burdening taxpayers who inadvertently failed to report foreign accounts on information returns, and to adopt more reasonable policies that will restore its credibility and be more consistent with its mission to promote voluntary compliance. For example, TAS will continue to advocate for the IRS to expand its Streamlined Program to U.S. residents, to clarify and formalize the terms of its OVD programs by requesting public comments and then publishing guidance in the federal register (rather than a website posting), and revise Forms 8938 and/or TD F 90–22 .1 to reduce taxpayer burden and the duplicative reporting. TAS will report its progress in the National Taxpayer Advocate 2013 Annual Report to Congress.

 

Parag P. Patel, Esq.About the Author

Parag P. Patel, Esq. brings over three decades of experience to individuals and businesses facing complex tax problems. Holding advanced degrees from Georgetown University Law Center (J.D.) and New York University School of Law (LL.M. in Tax Law), the nation’s top tax programs, Mr. Patel delivers sophisticated and creative strategies in complicated federal and state audits, penalty abatements, and foreign asset/income reporting. His practice emphasizes international tax matters, specifically foreign financial account reporting (FBAR), voluntary disclosures, and penalty defense.

Book a Paid Legal Consultation

Related Posts

  • National Taxpayer Advocate Delivers Annual Report to Congress that Criticizes Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Programs

    National Taxpayer Advocate Nina E. Olson today released her 2014 annual report to Congress, which…

  • National Taxpayer Advocate Identifies OVDP Program as a Serious Problem

    On January 17 that National Taxpayer Advocate Nina Olson recently issued her 2012 Annual Report…

  • National Taxpayer Advocate Fights for FTA Penalty Relief from the IRS

    National Taxpayer Advocate Erin M. Collins today released her statutorily mandated midyear report to Congress. The…

Tags: FBARforeign account offshore offshore accounts ovdi OVDP penalties and interest
Category: Planning for Tax Minimization

Post navigation

Previous: Pre-immigration estate planning
Next: Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) online registration program is launched

Related Posts

IRS Streamlines its Streamlined Offshore Procedures with More User Friendly Forms

The IRS has just recently updated the Streamlined Procedure forms…

Read More

Traveling? Resolve Tax Debt Before Getting Your Passport

IR-2019-23, February 27, 2019 WASHINGTON ― The Internal Revenue Service today reiterated…

Read More

Consider a tax legal opinion to confirm clients’ 199A Specified Service Trades or Businesses (SSTB) status

On Aug. 8, 2018, the IRS released proposed regulations around…

Read More

Recent Posts

  • The Enforcement Surge: What the DOJ and IRS Campaign Means for Tax Professionals and Their ClientsOctober 17, 2026
  • The High Price of Payroll Tax Non-Compliance: Lessons from United States v. PittsSeptember 15, 2026
  • FBAR Willfulness, Recklessness, and the Excessive Fines Defense: Key Takeaways from United States v. RundSeptember 11, 2026
  • FBAR Enforcement and Penalty Analysis: United States v. NiksichSeptember 5, 2026
  • Billions Offshore, Millions Missed: What TIGTA’s Report Means for FATCA EnforcementSeptember 2, 2026
  • Criminal Tax Enforcement Takes Center Stage: The National Fraud Enforcement Division MemorandumAugust 21, 2026
  • Navigating New Jersey Tobacco and Vapor Excise Tax AuditsAugust 11, 2026
  • Navigating the US Estate Portability Election: Strategic Timing and Compliance Procedures for Form 706July 13, 2026
  • IRS Transitions from First Time Abatement to Automated Penalty Relief: Strategic Impacts for Tax AdvisorsJuly 11, 2026
  • Parag Patel to Present on IRS Foreign Asset Enforcement at the 2026 NATP TaxposiumJuly 9, 2026

Search

Archives

  • October 2026
  • September 2026
  • August 2026
  • July 2026
  • June 2026
  • May 2026
  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • September 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • December 2006
  • July 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • March 2001
  • March 1999
  • February 1998
  • August 1996
  • July 1996

Meta

  • Log in

Categories

  • Estate Planning and Probate
  • Planning for Tax Minimization

Law Firm Attorney WordPress Theme By Themespride