Skip to content
Tax Law Center Blog

Tax Law Center Blog

  • Tax & Foreign Assets
    • Tax Law Services
    • Foreign Asset Planning
  • About
  • Contact Us
Close Button

New Much-Needed Guidance for Non-Willful FBAR violations

31 May, 2015

Last week, the Internal Revenue Service released interim guidance (SBSE-04-0515-0025) on foreign bank account report (FBAR) (also known as FinCen 114) penalties to improve the administration of the FBAR compliance program. The guidance contains amendments to the Internal Revenue Manual (IRM), effective immediately, and applies to all open cases in which the FBAR penalties are at issue. Examiners are required to implement these new procedures to help ensure consistent, effective and fair administration of the penalties. A Civil FBAR Penalty Case File Checklist is also included to further establish consistency in FBAR case file information.

We find that the guidance is much needed in light of the lack of uniformity in the IRS’ application of FBAR non-willful penalties.

The memo states that a non-willful penalty will not be recommended if the IRS determines that the FBAR violations were due to reasonable cause and the person later files correct and complete FBARs.

In regard to non-willful violations when there are multiple accounts, the memorandum indicates in most cases only one $10,000 penalty should be imposed in each year, not $10,000 per account. The memorandum also notes, however, that lesser penalties (e.g., only imposing the penalty in one year) or greater penalties (i.e., per account penalties) may be imposed when appropriate.

Attachment 1 of the memo states that if conditions for mitigation guidelines are met then:

“examiners should make a preliminary penalty calculation based upon the mitigation guidelines in IRM 4.26.16.4.6.2, except that the penalty for each year will be limited to $10,000. This is the penalty amount, unless the facts and circumstances of a case warrant a different penalty amount.

If the facts and circumstances of a case warrant a lower penalty amount, examiners, with the group manager’s approval after consultation with an Operating Division FBAR Coordinator, may assert a single penalty, not to exceed $10,000, for one year only.” (italics added for emphasis)

This clarifies the old punitive rule that could have been interpreted and applied as $10,000 per account per year.  This memo is clearly helpful to taxpayers, since it indicates that maximum penalties should be the exception not the default starting point.

While the IRS examiner has significant discretion this memo provides some much-needed guidance to taxpayers and examiners alike for FBAR penalties. Since the actual amount of the penalties is still largely determined based upon “facts and circumstances” there remains a significant opportunity for persuasive legal advocacy to minimize FBAR penalties.

Also, the memorandum notes that when accounts have co-owners, each shall be attributed the appropriate percentage ownership of the account balances in computing penalties. Co-owners of an unreported foreign financial account don’t necessarily have to be held jointly liable. Separate determinations must be made with respect to each co-owner as to whether there was a violation.

The interim guidance will be incorporated into IRM 4.26.16, Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (FBAR), and IRM 4.26.17,Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (FBAR) Procedures, no later than one year from the date of issuance.

 

Related Posts

  • New IRS Guidelines for Willful FBAR violations

    Last week, the Internal Revenue Service released interim guidance (SBSE-04-0515-0025) on foreign bank account report…

  • Helpful Non-willful FBAR penalty case decided by court

    For the first time, in the case of James Moore, Plaintiff v. United States of…

  • Argue for No Penalty and a Warning Letter for FBAR Violations

    The IRS may send a warning letter in lieu of asserting penalties for failure to…

Tags: FBARforeign account offshore offshore accounts OVDP voluntary disclosure
Category: Planning for Tax Minimization

Post navigation

Previous: Beware of U.S. tax consequences to a foreign trust with a U.S. beneficiary
Next: New IRS Guidelines for Willful FBAR violations

Related Posts

Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Initiative/Program (OVDI/OVDP) opt-out results and updates

Many of our clients are carefully considering OVDI opt-outs. The…

Read More

If you are a landlord, what changes need to be made to assure that you can be considered to be an active trade or business to qualify for the Section 199A deduction if you have net income from the rentals?

Internal Revenue Code Section 199A was enacted as part of…

Read More

IRS Guidance Targets Cash Reporting in the Cannabis Industry

The IRS closely monitors cash transactions to ensure businesses across…

Read More

Recent Posts

  • The IRS Starts Using AI in Tax FunctionsNovember 27, 2025
  • The $90 Million Red Flag: Concealment, Trust Funds, and the Peril of Undocumented Labor in the Padilla IndictmentNovember 21, 2025
  • Parag Patel, Esq. Presents “Latest Federal Tax Controversy Update” for NJCPA Membership+November 13, 2025
  • Parag Patel, Esq. Presents at New Jersey Society of Certified Public Accountants — “One Big Beautiful Bill”November 11, 2025
  • The Trust Fund Recovery Penalty in Focus: United States v. Flaim and the Unwavering Standard of “Willfulness”November 7, 2025

Pages

  • About Patel Law Offices
  • Delinquent FinCen Form 114 (FBAR) Filings
  • Delinquent or unfiled IRS Form 5471
  • Request A Free Educational Consultation

Law Firm Attorney WordPress Theme By Themespride