Skip to content
Tax Law Center Blog

Tax Law Center Blog

  • Tax & Foreign Assets
    • Tax Law Services
    • Foreign Asset Planning
  • About
  • Contact Us
Close Button

Argue for No Penalty and a Warning Letter for FBAR Violations

22 December, 2013

The IRS may send a warning letter in lieu of asserting penalties for failure to file a Form TD F 90-22.1, “Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts,” if it would be sufficient to bring the individual into compliance, an IRS official recently said.

Jason Kuratnick, IRS associate area counsel (Philadelphia), Small Business/Self-Employed Division, explained that the Office of Chief Counsel reviews every proposed FBAR penalty. “Our office is involved early” and is ensuring that adequate facts exist to support the proposed assessment, said Kuratnick. Once chief counsel approves an FBAR penalty, it stands behind it, he added. Kuratnick spoke on a panel at the IRS Eastern Pennsylvania Working Together Conference in Malvern, Pa.

The largest penalties apply to persons who willfully violate FBAR requirements and include up to 50 percent of the value of the account that is not reported. Kuratnick said that when applying the willfulness penalty, the IRS looks for circumstantial evidence that the taxpayer had knowledge of a filing obligation, such as a prior warning letter or penalties. If a person who conducts all his banking in the U.S. decides to open an account in a foreign country, the IRS will be interested in the reasons for opening the account. It will also consider whether the account is inherited and how the taxpayer treated other inherited accounts.

Under IRM 4.26.16.4  (FBAR Penalties) (07-01-2008) whenever there is an FBARviolation, the examiner will either issue the FBAR warning letter, Letter 3800, or determine a penalty. Penalties should be asserted only to promote compliance with the FBAR reporting and recordkeeping requirements. In exercising their discretion, examiners should consider whether the issuance of a warning letter and the securing of delinquent FBARs, rather than the assertion of a penalty, will achieve the desired result of improving compliance in the future. Under IRM 4.26.16.4, examiners are expected to exercise discretion, taking into account the facts and circumstances of each case, in determining whether penalties should be asserted.

In some of our cases, the Taxpayer failed to timely file FBARs as a result of a misunderstanding of fact or law that is reasonable in light of Taxpayers’ advanced age, disability, and lack of knowledge, education and sophistication.  Through the OVDP, our client has also filed all delinquent FBARs. Therefore, in some cases, the issuance of FBAR warning letter 3800, rather than the assertion of a penalty, will achieve the IRS’ desired result of improving compliance in the future.

Our law firm expects unabated aggressive enforcement of the US tax laws, including increased criminal prosecutions and civil audit examinations. We have been advising our clients to expect the unexpected (and the worst) in their tax treatment and disclosure of offshore assets.

Patel Law Offices is a law firm dedicated to helping clients resolve complicated tax, criminal tax, and international tax problems. Our firm assists (and defends) clients and their advisors to legally disclose (and legitimize) foreign accounts.

Related Posts

  • Citizenship renunciation fee increases as American expatriates flee FATCA

    US government fees charged to Americans for renouncing their citizenship will rocket from $450 to…

  • A solution in a tough tax season: the IRS Streamlined Offshore Procedures

    In the midst of tough tax season, many U.S taxpayers are unfortunately surprised to discover…

  • How to Demonstrate Non-Willfulness Under The Streamlined Filing Compliance Procedures

    The IRS recently announced Streamlined Filing Compliance Procedures in an effort to encourage U.S. taxpayers…

Tags: FBARforeign account hsbc offshore offshore accounts ovdi penalties and interest voluntary disclosure
Category: Planning for Tax Minimization

Post navigation

Previous: Swiss Banks are Pressuring Customers to Disclose
Next: U.S. Signs FATCA Pacts with Malta, Netherlands, Bermuda, Jersey, Guernsey and Isle of Man

Related Posts

Foreign Gift Received: Form 3520 Penalties Eliminated in New Court Case

The US DOJ Tax Division recently conceded penalties assessed against…

Read More

The Trust Fund Recovery Penalty in Focus: United States v. Flaim and the Unwavering Standard of “Willfulness”

The Trust Fund Recovery Penalty (TFRP), authorized under Internal Revenue…

Read More

Accountant-Client vs Attorney-Client Confidentiality

Both Accountant-Client vs Attorney-Client Confidentiality are designed to protect the…

Read More

Recent Posts

  • The Enforcement Surge: What the DOJ and IRS Campaign Means for Tax Professionals and Their ClientsOctober 17, 2026
  • The High Price of Payroll Tax Non-Compliance: Lessons from United States v. PittsSeptember 15, 2026
  • FBAR Willfulness, Recklessness, and the Excessive Fines Defense: Key Takeaways from United States v. RundSeptember 11, 2026
  • FBAR Enforcement and Penalty Analysis: United States v. NiksichSeptember 5, 2026
  • Billions Offshore, Millions Missed: What TIGTA’s Report Means for FATCA EnforcementSeptember 2, 2026
  • Criminal Tax Enforcement Takes Center Stage: The National Fraud Enforcement Division MemorandumAugust 21, 2026
  • Navigating New Jersey Tobacco and Vapor Excise Tax AuditsAugust 11, 2026
  • Navigating the US Estate Portability Election: Strategic Timing and Compliance Procedures for Form 706July 13, 2026
  • IRS Transitions from First Time Abatement to Automated Penalty Relief: Strategic Impacts for Tax AdvisorsJuly 11, 2026
  • Parag Patel to Present on IRS Foreign Asset Enforcement at the 2026 NATP TaxposiumJuly 9, 2026

Law Firm Attorney WordPress Theme By Themespride