Skip to content
Tax Law Center Blog

Tax Law Center Blog

  • Tax & Foreign Assets
    • Tax Law Services
    • Foreign Asset Planning
  • About
  • Contact Us
Close Button

Swiss Banks are Pressuring Customers to Disclose

21 December, 2013

Swiss banks are pressuring current and former U.S. account holders to disclose undeclared assets to the Internal Revenue Service.

In some cases, the banks are freezing accounts unless clients can prove they have declared the account to the IRS—or that they are trying to enter the agency’s limited-amnesty program for U.S. taxpayers with secret accounts.

In addition, many Swiss banks are sending letters to current or former U.S. clients warning that information about their accounts will be soon turned over to the IRS. Taxpayers who don’t step forward to the IRS before the agency obtains information about them usually face higher penalties and are at risk for criminal prosecution. Many Swiss banks will be turning over details of accounts in existence as far back as August 2008.

Many advisors recommend that noncompliant U.S. taxpayers who have or had Swiss accounts move to declare them immediately.

The pressure is the latest result of an intense campaign by U.S. officials against offshore tax evasion that took shape after Swiss banking giant UBS admitted in 2009 that it helped U.S. taxpayers hide money abroad. UBS paid $780 million to the U.S. and turned over the names of more than 4,000 U.S. taxpayers with accounts to settle U.S. charges, effectively ending decades of Swiss bank secrecy.

In August, U.S. and Swiss officials announced a comprehensive program allowing many small and medium-size Swiss banks to settle with the U.S. It doesn’t apply to about a dozen larger banks still under active investigation by the Justice Department.

As of mid-December, more than half of Switzerland’s government-backed local banks said they will participate in the program, including ones in Bern, Geneva and Lucerne. Other banks that have said they will cooperate include Valiant Bank, Migros Bank, and PostFinance, which is backed by the Swiss postal system. A large portion of Switzerland’s roughly 300 banks are expected to take part in the U.S. program, but not all are expected to publicly disclose their participation.

Banks that do participate should be able to settle outstanding legal issues with the U.S. However, many will have to turn over account information on U.S. taxpayers and pay stiff penalties up to 50% of the balance of the accounts to obtain legal closure.

Swiss banks hope to reduce their own penalties by pressuring their clients to confess.

Related Posts

  • More Swiss Banks Agree to Disclose US Customers Accounts: Expect More Customer Letters to be Sent

    As of yesterday, three Swiss banks have agreed to participate in a U.S. disclosure program…

  • HSBC Payment of Largest Penalty and FATCA Encourages Taxpayers to Disclose

    Last month, HSBC Holdings agreed to pay $1.92 billion in fines to U.S. authorities, which…

  • What is a "FATCA Compliance Certificate"?

    Many foreign banks and financial institutions have recently been asking customers for a "FATCA Compliance…

Tags: FBARforeign account hsbc ovdi OVDP penalties and interest voluntary disclosure
Category: Planning for Tax Minimization

Post navigation

Previous: US Department of Justice Encourages Swiss banks to Disclose Information
Next: Argue for No Penalty and a Warning Letter for FBAR Violations

Related Posts

New Favorable Court Decision: One penalty (not multiple) applies for late FBAR filing

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit today—in…

Read More

Top 4 Exceptions to FBAR Filing Requirement

FBARs are due this week (again).  Below are the top…

Read More

FinCen 114 Foreign Bank Account Report (FBAR) Penalties Developments

The FinCen 114 Foreign Bank Account Report (FBAR) continues to…

Read More

Recent Posts

  • The Enforcement Surge: What the DOJ and IRS Campaign Means for Tax Professionals and Their ClientsOctober 17, 2026
  • The High Price of Payroll Tax Non-Compliance: Lessons from United States v. PittsSeptember 15, 2026
  • FBAR Willfulness, Recklessness, and the Excessive Fines Defense: Key Takeaways from United States v. RundSeptember 11, 2026
  • FBAR Enforcement and Penalty Analysis: United States v. NiksichSeptember 5, 2026
  • Billions Offshore, Millions Missed: What TIGTA’s Report Means for FATCA EnforcementSeptember 2, 2026
  • Criminal Tax Enforcement Takes Center Stage: The National Fraud Enforcement Division MemorandumAugust 21, 2026
  • Navigating New Jersey Tobacco and Vapor Excise Tax AuditsAugust 11, 2026
  • Navigating the US Estate Portability Election: Strategic Timing and Compliance Procedures for Form 706July 13, 2026
  • IRS Transitions from First Time Abatement to Automated Penalty Relief: Strategic Impacts for Tax AdvisorsJuly 11, 2026
  • Parag Patel to Present on IRS Foreign Asset Enforcement at the 2026 NATP TaxposiumJuly 9, 2026

Law Firm Attorney WordPress Theme By Themespride