Skip to content
Tax Law Center Blog

Tax Law Center Blog

  • Tax & Foreign Assets
    • Tax Law Services
    • Foreign Asset Planning
  • About
  • Contact Us
Close Button

New Unreported Offshore Assets case: Bad facts leads to bad results

1 February, 2018

A resident of Connecticut who was originally from Korea has been hit with a record civil penalty of $14M, a six month prison sentence, and a fine of $100,000 for failing to report Swiss bank accounts totaling around $28M, the US Department of Justice (DoJ) has announced. The sentence is an indication that the US DoJ is seeking to significantly increase penalties it levies against offshore tax evaders.

Under US law, Americans and others with US tax obligations, such as greencard holders, must disclose any foreign financial accounts worth more than $10,000, by filing a FBAR, or Foreign Bank Account Report. Enforcement of this law increased after the signing into law of the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act, or FATCA, in 2010.

According to a statement issued by the DoJ, Hyong Kwon Kim, a citizen of South Korea and, since 1998, a legal permanent resident of the United States, resided in Massachusetts and later in Connecticut.  Kim, a sophisticated business executive who ran family businesses with operations in the United States and internationally, inherited tens of millions of dollars that he stashed in secret accounts at Credit Suisse, its subsidiaries, and another Swiss bank.  Kim deliberately violated the U.S. bank secrecy laws by failing to report his foreign financial accounts to the Treasury Department.  U.S. citizens, resident aliens, and permanent legal residents with a foreign financial interest in or signatory authority over a foreign financial account worth more than $10,000 are required to file a Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts, commonly known as an FBAR, disclosing the account.

In addition, the DoJ said, Kim “conspired with a host of foreign enablers” including his Swiss attorney and un-named bankers “to conceal his assets and income in Swiss accounts held in his own name, the name of a relative, and in the names of sham corporate entities”, and otherwise to “structure financial transactions in a manner that allowed him to utilize [his offshore-held] funds in the United States, while concealing his ownership and control” of them.

In order to do this, the DoJ said, he had had checks issued to third parties in the United States, in order to purchase a luxury home in Greenwich, Connecticut, a waterfront vacation retreat in Chatham, Massachusetts, and jewelry adorned with multi-carat diamonds, emeralds, and rubies; a “sham entity” was created in order to conceal his ownership of a vacation home.

The amount of the unreported or underreported accounts is over $28 million.  The FBAR penalty is over $14 million.  The sentence is only 6 months.

Although the 50% penalty is high, willful civil violations can result in tax, penalties and interest totaling 325% of the highest balance in the account for the most recent six years period.

The DoJ noted that US district court Judge Brinkema had taken Kim’s “cooperation with the government, which occurred [over] more than a five-year span”, into account in pronouncing the sentence on January 25, 2018.

The facts of this case are bad and unfavorable to the taxpayer, hence the high penalties. Taxpayers with better facts can expect better results and avoid prosecution and high penalties.

Related Posts

  • IRS Official Announces New Focus on Offshore Assets in Indian Banks

    Reporting on a California State Bar Tax Section Meeting, Tax Notes reports that the IRS…

  • Opting Out of the Offshore Voluntary Compliance Initiative Programs

    As with other IRS’ 2009 and 2011 offshore voluntary compliance initiatives, the 2012 program gives…

  • Frequent Scenarios in Offshore Voluntary Disclosures

    I have frequently seen the following scenarios in working with clients to determine whether a…

Tags: Asset ProtectionFBAR foreign account offshore accounts penalties and interest Streamlined Filing Compliance Procedures and the Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program
Category: Planning for Tax Minimization

Post navigation

Previous: FBAR statute of limitations court case ruling
Next: Run to the Door: IRS Terminates Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program (OVDP) effective September 28, 2018

Related Posts

The Risks of “Opting Out” of OVDI

Under the 2011 OVDI voluntary disclosure program, the penalties for…

Read More

The IRS Large Business and International division (LB&I) has announced a new Offshore Private Banking enforcement campaign

The new Offshore Private Banking enforcement campaign was recently identified…

Read More

Watch Out: The NJ Inheritance Tax

New Jersey imposes a transfer Inheritance Tax, at graduated rates,…

Read More

Recent Posts

  • Parag Patel Esq. speaker at the National Association of Enrolled Agents (NAEA) Seminar “2025 Mid-Year Update”September 1, 2025
  • The Complex Landscape of FBAR and Foreign Asset Reporting: A Critical Webinar Update for Tax Professionals (Free)August 31, 2025
  • The Department of Justice’s Focus on Employment Tax CrimesAugust 29, 2025
  • Dr. Sriram Case: A Summary of Key Tax and Legal IssuesAugust 28, 2025
  • All Things Appeals Webinar: A Strategic Guide for Tax ProfessionalsAugust 26, 2025

Pages

  • About Patel Law Offices
  • Delinquent FinCen Form 114 (FBAR) Filings
  • Delinquent or unfiled IRS Form 5471
  • Request A Free Educational Consultation

Law Firm Attorney WordPress Theme By Themespride