Skip to content
Tax Law Center Blog

Tax Law Center Blog

  • Tax & Foreign Assets
    • Tax Law Services
    • Foreign Asset Planning
  • About
  • Contact Us
Close Button

FBAR Reforms Recommended

31 October, 2016

If you have a financial interest in or signature authority over a foreign financial account, including a bank account, brokerage account, mutual fund, trust, or other type of foreign financial account, exceeding certain thresholds, the Bank Secrecy Act may require you to report the account yearly to the Department of Treasury by electronically filing a Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) 114, Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (FBAR).

 

However, FinCEN has recently made a number of proposals (RIN 1506-AB26) to revise its regulations. The proposed regulations would conform the FBAR filing deadlines to the new April 15 date, update the filing exemption for officers and employees with signature authority but no financial interest, and require filers with 25 or more accounts to begin reporting detailed information on each account on their annual FBAR filing.

 

The American Institute of CPAs (AICPA) has submitted comments to the government regarding these proposed changes. The AICPA recommended in an October 18 letter that:

  • Any taxpayer who submits a timely extension request for their calendar year federal income tax return should automatically receive a corresponding extension to October 15 to file their FBAR;
  • FinCen make available on its website a simple-to-complete electronic extension request for use by taxpayers who do not request a filing extension of their federal income tax return;
  • FinCEN coordinate with tax preparation software vendors to ensure that both tax professionals and individual taxpayers have ready access for electronic filing of FBAR extensions through their products;
  • FinCEN’s final regulations include a provision to grant an automatic extension until June 15 to FBAR filers located overseas or who maintain their books and records overseas;
  • FinCEN permit taxpayers with signature authority but no financial interest in accounts whose filing requirements have been deferred since 2011 to not be required to file the deferred FBARs provided they would have qualified for the expanded filing exemption proposed by FinCEN; (currently the accounts need to be listed in Part IV of the FBAR)
  • FinCEN allow filers with 25 or more accounts to provide the information as an attachment to their FBAR return; (currently the accounts need not be listed) and
  • FinCEN continue to provide an exemption from filing an FBAR to officers and employees of certain federally-regulated entities for accounts over which they have signature authority but no financial interest.

FBAR compliance is difficult already and non-compliance penalties are extreme. We recommend some additional penalty reform recommendations, especially for non-willful cases (currently there is a $10,000 per account per year penalty).

We believe most of the AICPA’s user-friendly pro-taxpayer recommendations should be adopted by the government.

Related Posts

  • Some FBAR Deadlines Extended

    Last week the Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) again extended the deadline for…

  • New FBAR Deadlines and Penalty Relief available

    The US Surface Transportation and Veterans Health Care Choice Improvement Act of 2015 (the Act)…

  • New FinCEN Form 114 (FBAR) Filing Rules Announced

    Responding to the needs of many filers who submit Reports of Foreign Bank and Financial…

Tags: amnestyAsset Protection FBAR foreign account SDOP voluntary disclosure
Category: Planning for Tax Minimization

Post navigation

Previous: 5 Estate Planning Tips to Avoid Disputes
Next: US Taxation of Foreign trusts: Foreign grantor trust

Related Posts

How to Respond or Contest an IRS Criminal Investigation Division (CID) Summons

To contest an IRS Criminal Investigation Division (CID) summons, you…

Read More

Is the IRS Finally Receiving Increased Funding?

After months of back and forth, it appears that additional…

Read More

Comparison of Form 8938 and FBAR Requirements

The new Form 8938 filing requirement does not replace or…

Read More

Recent Posts

  • The Enforcement Surge: What the DOJ and IRS Campaign Means for Tax Professionals and Their ClientsOctober 17, 2026
  • The High Price of Payroll Tax Non-Compliance: Lessons from United States v. PittsSeptember 15, 2026
  • FBAR Willfulness, Recklessness, and the Excessive Fines Defense: Key Takeaways from United States v. RundSeptember 11, 2026
  • FBAR Enforcement and Penalty Analysis: United States v. NiksichSeptember 5, 2026
  • Billions Offshore, Millions Missed: What TIGTA’s Report Means for FATCA EnforcementSeptember 2, 2026
  • Criminal Tax Enforcement Takes Center Stage: The National Fraud Enforcement Division MemorandumAugust 21, 2026
  • Navigating New Jersey Tobacco and Vapor Excise Tax AuditsAugust 11, 2026
  • Navigating the US Estate Portability Election: Strategic Timing and Compliance Procedures for Form 706July 13, 2026
  • IRS Transitions from First Time Abatement to Automated Penalty Relief: Strategic Impacts for Tax AdvisorsJuly 11, 2026
  • Parag Patel to Present on IRS Foreign Asset Enforcement at the 2026 NATP TaxposiumJuly 9, 2026

Law Firm Attorney WordPress Theme By Themespride