Skip to content
Tax Law Center Blog

Tax Law Center Blog

  • Tax & Foreign Assets
    • Tax Law Services
    • Foreign Asset Planning
  • About
  • Contact Us
Close Button

50% Penalty for Taxpayers Who Hold Accounts at a Bank Under Investigation

21 June, 2014

The Internal Revenue Service announced last week changes to its programs for taxpayers with undeclared offshore accounts, the latest step in a five-year campaign against such accounts held by U.S. taxpayers. The modifications greatly eased penalties for people who were unaware of tax and disclosure requirements.

At the same time, the IRS sharply increased the penalty for people in its amnesty program who intended to cheat. For taxpayers who enter the OVDP program after it becomes public that a bank where the taxpayer holds an account is under investigation by the IRS or Department of Justice, the offshore penalty is increased from 27.5% to 50% of the highest balance of the taxpayer’s foreign accounts/assets during the preceding 8 years.  Although the list may grow as FATCA is implemented, the current list of those banks include:

  • HSBC India

•      UBS AG

•      Credit Suisse AG, Credit Suisse Fides, and Clariden Leu Ltd.

•      Wegelin & Co.

•      Liechtensteinische Landesbank AG

•      Zurcher Kantonalbank

•      Swisspartners

•      CIBC FirstCaribbean International Bank Limited, its predecessors, subsidiaries, and affiliates

•      Stanford International Bank, Ltd., Stanford Group Company, and Stanford Trust Company, Ltd.

•      The Bank of N.T. Butterfield & Son Limited (also known as Butterfield Bank and Bank of Butterfield)

The IRS released the above list with 10 banks currently under investigation whose clients could be subject to the 50% penalty. It also disclosed that the higher penalty would take effect on August 4.

The IRS is quietly applying pressure to noncompliant taxpayers to come out of the dark and disclose their accounts or face extremely high penalties.

The list does not include all of the the names of other financial institutions that have surfaced in criminal cases involving individuals with offshore accounts. An IRS spokesman says that for now the list is complete, and that it will be “kept up to date.”  The IRS can add names to the list and probably will add banks after FATCA implementation over the next several months.

The IRS announcement and program changes seem to make it easier for some taxpayers and more difficult for others. Detailed analysis is required to ascertain the risk/reward for each taxpayer.  Regardless, as FATCA continues to go fully online (and the bank list grows), the cost and risk of doing nothing seems to have gone up significantly. In summary, taxpayers with undisclosed offshore accounts  should fully explore some form of voluntary disclosure before it is too late and much more costly.

Related Posts

  • Estate Planning: List of To-Do Items

    The idea of a visit to an attorney for your estate planning can be unsettling…

  • FATCA-Compliant Institutions List Goes Online

    While over 77,000 banks and financial institutions have registered under FATCA—the Foreign Account Tax Compliance…

  • Top Six Criminal Tax Questions Asked

    We get many questions from clients (and their advisors) about criminal tax. So I have…

Tags: amnestyAsset Protection FBAR foreign account hsbc offshore accounts OVDP penalties and interest voluntary disclosure
Category: Planning for Tax Minimization

Post navigation

Previous: New IRS Disclosure Program Announced for Non-Resident Taxpayers: Streamlined Foreign Offshore Procedures
Next: IRS announces new Streamlined Filing Compliance Procedures

Related Posts

Enforcement Update: Form 5471 Penalties

The IRS continues to aggressively enforce penalties related to Form…

Read More

Quiet or Silent Disclosure Commentary from the Government Accountability Office

The recent report from a government watchdog agency called the Government…

Read More

Parag Patel Esq. presents new tax law changes at Broward Chapter of The Florida Society of Enrolled Agents (FSEABC) Webinar

Parag Patel Esq. will be the main speaker at a…

Read More

Recent Posts

  • The Enforcement Surge: What the DOJ and IRS Campaign Means for Tax Professionals and Their ClientsOctober 17, 2026
  • The High Price of Payroll Tax Non-Compliance: Lessons from United States v. PittsSeptember 15, 2026
  • FBAR Willfulness, Recklessness, and the Excessive Fines Defense: Key Takeaways from United States v. RundSeptember 11, 2026
  • FBAR Enforcement and Penalty Analysis: United States v. NiksichSeptember 5, 2026
  • Billions Offshore, Millions Missed: What TIGTA’s Report Means for FATCA EnforcementSeptember 2, 2026
  • Criminal Tax Enforcement Takes Center Stage: The National Fraud Enforcement Division MemorandumAugust 21, 2026
  • Navigating New Jersey Tobacco and Vapor Excise Tax AuditsAugust 11, 2026
  • Navigating the US Estate Portability Election: Strategic Timing and Compliance Procedures for Form 706July 13, 2026
  • IRS Transitions from First Time Abatement to Automated Penalty Relief: Strategic Impacts for Tax AdvisorsJuly 11, 2026
  • Parag Patel to Present on IRS Foreign Asset Enforcement at the 2026 NATP TaxposiumJuly 9, 2026

Law Firm Attorney WordPress Theme By Themespride