Skip to content
Tax Law Center Blog

Tax Law Center Blog

  • Tax & Foreign Assets
    • Tax Law Services
    • Foreign Asset Planning
  • About
  • Contact Us
Close Button

Cayman Islands Advisors Arrest Suggest U.S. Government Receiving More Information About Offshore Accounts

8 April, 2014

According to a DOJ Tax Press Release, here, the IRS has arrested a U.S. Citizen and two Canadian citizens who offered enabler services to U.S. taxpayers.  They were caught in a classic IRS sting operation.  Here is a summary of the facts:

Joshua Vandyk, a U.S. citizen, and Eric St-Cyr and Patrick Poulin, Canadian citizens, were indicted for conspiracy to launder monetary instruments, the Department of Justice and Internal Revenue Service (IRS) announced today.  The indictment alleges that Vandyk, St-Cyr and Poulin conspired to conceal and disguise the nature, location, source, ownership and control of property believed to be the proceeds of bank fraud.  The Caribbean-based defendants allegedly assisted undercover law enforcement agents, posing as U.S. clients, in laundering purported criminal proceeds through an offshore structure designed to conceal the true identity of the proceeds’ owners.  Vandyk and St-Cyr invested the laundered funds on the clients’ behalf and represented the funds would not be reported to the U.S. government.

In addition to the conspiracy charge, Vandyk, St-Cyr and Poulin were each charged with two counts of money laundering.

According to the indictment, Vandyk and St-Cyr lived in the Cayman Islands and worked for an investment firm based in the Cayman Islands.  St-Cyr was the founder and head of the investment firm, whose clientele included numerous U.S. citizens.  Poulin, an attorney at a law firm based in Turks and Caicos, worked and resided in Canada and in the Turks and Caicos.  His clientele also included numerous U.S. citizens.   

 According to the indictment, Vandyk, St-Cyr and Poulin solicited U.S. citizens to use their services to hide assets from the U.S. government.  Vandyk and St-Cyr directed the undercover agents posing as U.S. clients to create offshore foundations with the assistance of Poulin and others because they and the investment firm did not want to appear to deal with U.S. clients.  Vandyk and St-Cyr used the offshore entities to move money into the Cayman Islands and used foreign attorneys as intermediaries for such transactions.

 According to the indictment, Poulin established an offshore foundation for the undercover agents posing as U.S. clients and served as a nominal board member in lieu of the clients.  Poulin transferred wire payments from the offshore foundations to the Cayman Islands, where Vandyk and St-Cyr invested those funds outside the United States in the name of the offshore foundation.  The investment firm represented that it would neither disclose the investments or any investment gains to the U.S. government, nor would it provide monthly statements or other investment statements to the clients.  Clients were able to monitor their investments online through the use of anonymous, numeric passcodes.  Upon request from the U.S. client, Vandyk and St-Cyr would liquidate investments and transfer money, through Poulin, back to the United States.  According to Vandyk and St-Cyr, the investment firm would charge clients higher fees to launder criminal proceeds than to assist them in tax evasion.

This past week, Assistant Attorney General Kathryn Keneally of the department’s Tax Division said the sting should serve as a warning about offshore accounts.  “The Cayman case illustrates that we have ways of getting information that people don’t know about,” Assistant Attorney General Kathryn Keneally of the department’s Tax Division said at a news conference in New York. “The days of waiting for a warning sign, such as a letter from a bank, are over.”  Keneally said that the government receives account information from many sources, including whistleblowers hoping for monetary rewards. She declined to comment on whether U.S. officials have the names of Americans who hold accounts in the Caymans or elsewhere in the Caribbean as a result of this probe.

Taxpayers are ineligible to participate in the IRS’s offshore voluntary disclosure program (OVDP) for undeclared offshore accounts if U.S. authorities already have their names. The program imposes steep penalties but offers protection against criminal prosecution.  It is believed that U.S. authorities do have names of account holders in the Caymans.

In March of last year, the indictment says, three undercover IRS agents met with St-Cyr and VanDyk in Miami. One of the agents represented himself as a U.S. citizen who wanted to launder $2 million.  To show how the scheme worked, Poulin, VanDyk and St-Cyr arranged several transfers of $200,000, the indictment alleges. In December, the funds were wired from a Virginia account to an account at Poulin’s law firm in the Turks and Caicos, according to the indictment. The $200,000 was then moved to an account in the Cayman Islands, and most of it was returned to the U.S. in February. Poulin allegedly told the IRS agents that most of his clients were Canadian or American. The entire $2 million was intended to be concealed, in part by using a foundation named Zero Exposure in the Turks and Caicos.

St-Cyr and VanDyk allegedly said that they charged clients more to launder criminal proceeds than to assist in tax evasion, according to the indictment. They also said a foundation was preferred for laundering criminal proceeds, while a trust was sufficient to conceal tax evasion.

Related Posts

  • IRS' Takes Legal Action Against Offshore HSBC Indian Accounts

    Last week the U.S. Justice Department asked a federal district court in San Francisco to…

  • Another Customer with Unreported Offshore Bank Accounts Pleads Guilty

    George Landegger, CEO of pulp and paper company, pleaded guilty last week in New York…

  • New voluntary disclosure program for offshore accounts in 2011

    The IRS...described the new program as “somewhat similar” to the prior program.

Tags: FBARforeign account OVDP voluntary disclosure
Category: Planning for Tax Minimization

Post navigation

Previous: Tax treaty tie-breakers
Next: IRS issues new information document request (IDR) directives

Related Posts

John Doe Summons: A potent investigative tool used by the IRS

The John Doe summons is a powerful investigative tool employed…

Read More

Recent Court Decision Shows Risks of IRS Streamlined Filing Compliance Procedures

A recent court decision from the United States Court of…

Read More

Start 2021 with a few New Year’s tax planning resolutions

COVID-related legislation drove a lot of tax changes for 2020…

Read More

Recent Posts

  • Parag Patel Esq. speaker at the National Association of Enrolled Agents (NAEA) Seminar “2025 Mid-Year Update”September 1, 2025
  • The Complex Landscape of FBAR and Foreign Asset Reporting: A Critical Webinar Update for Tax Professionals (Free)August 31, 2025
  • The Department of Justice’s Focus on Employment Tax CrimesAugust 29, 2025
  • Dr. Sriram Case: A Summary of Key Tax and Legal IssuesAugust 28, 2025
  • All Things Appeals Webinar: A Strategic Guide for Tax ProfessionalsAugust 26, 2025

Pages

  • About Patel Law Offices
  • Delinquent FinCen Form 114 (FBAR) Filings
  • Delinquent or unfiled IRS Form 5471
  • Request A Free Educational Consultation

Law Firm Attorney WordPress Theme By Themespride