Skip to content
Tax Law Center Blog

Tax Law Center Blog

  • Tax & Foreign Assets
    • Tax Law Services
    • Foreign Asset Planning
  • About
  • Contact Us
Close Button

Citizenship renunciation fee increases as American expatriates flee FATCA

13 September, 2014

US government fees charged to Americans for renouncing their citizenship will rocket from $450 to $2,350 on September 12, 2014.

The fivefold increase is probably related to the recent dramatic rise in renunciations triggered by the US Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act. FATCA forces foreign banks and other institutions to report their US clients’ financial doings to the Internal Revenue Service as from April 2015, after which it will become much more difficult for US expatriates to remain below the US tax radar.

Last year 3,000 US persons applied to renounce, more than treble the previous year’s figure, and ten times that of 2008. The 2014 numbers are expected to break that record. About three-quarters of applicants are in Switzerland (where rock star Tina Turner was perhaps the most famous of recent years), the UK, and Canada.

The US State Department justifies the increase by claiming that documenting a renunciation is very costly, since it requires at least two personal interviews between the applicant and the local American consul. It acknowledges, though, that the rapid rise in demand is one of the reasons for the increase, since these interviews are now ‘consuming far more consular time and resources’. Waiting times for expatriation interviews have soared from a few weeks to six months in some jurisdictions.

However, renunciation is not necessarily an easy panacea for US expatriates. They may not be granted the privilege unless they can prove tax compliance, and in any case, the IRS will impose an exit tax in the form of a capital gains charge on assets declared. It is also legally impossible to renounce citizenship while retaining the right of residence in the USA.

Our firm presented an informational webinar on the new Streamlined Filing Compliance Procedures available to many expats. Materials from the webinar can be downloaded here: Game Changer Streamline. While the streamlined program offers a welcome option for many taxpayers with undeclared accounts, other ways to address past noncompliance remain viable, including the OVDP program and Delinquent FBAR Submission Procedures and Delinquent International Information Return Submission Procedures.

Sources

  • Wall Street Journal
  • Money News
  • Forbes
  • Federal Register (PDF file)
  • US State Department
  • STEP News

 

Related Posts

  • Argue for No Penalty and a Warning Letter for FBAR Violations

    The IRS may send a warning letter in lieu of asserting penalties for failure to…

  • A solution in a tough tax season: the IRS Streamlined Offshore Procedures

    In the midst of tough tax season, many U.S taxpayers are unfortunately surprised to discover…

  • How to Demonstrate Non-Willfulness Under The Streamlined Filing Compliance Procedures

    The IRS recently announced Streamlined Filing Compliance Procedures in an effort to encourage U.S. taxpayers…

Tags: amnestyAsset Protection FBAR foreign account penalties and interest SDOP voluntary disclosure
Category: Planning for Tax Minimization

Post navigation

Previous: New IRS internal procedure guidance for Streamline Filing Compliance Procedures
Next: Watch Out for Letters From Your Foreign Bank Requesting Information On Your U.S. Residency

Related Posts

National Taxpayer Advocate Identifies OVDP Program as a Serious Problem

On January 17 that National Taxpayer Advocate Nina Olson recently…

Read More

US Tax Treatment of a UK Self-invested personal pension (SIPP)

We have had many clients with British retirement accounts and…

Read More

More Swiss Banks Agree to Disclose US Customers Accounts: Expect More Customer Letters to be Sent

As of yesterday, three Swiss banks have agreed to participate…

Read More

Recent Posts

  • The Enforcement Surge: What the DOJ and IRS Campaign Means for Tax Professionals and Their ClientsOctober 17, 2026
  • The High Price of Payroll Tax Non-Compliance: Lessons from United States v. PittsSeptember 15, 2026
  • FBAR Willfulness, Recklessness, and the Excessive Fines Defense: Key Takeaways from United States v. RundSeptember 11, 2026
  • FBAR Enforcement and Penalty Analysis: United States v. NiksichSeptember 5, 2026
  • Billions Offshore, Millions Missed: What TIGTA’s Report Means for FATCA EnforcementSeptember 2, 2026
  • Criminal Tax Enforcement Takes Center Stage: The National Fraud Enforcement Division MemorandumAugust 21, 2026
  • Navigating New Jersey Tobacco and Vapor Excise Tax AuditsAugust 11, 2026
  • Navigating the US Estate Portability Election: Strategic Timing and Compliance Procedures for Form 706July 13, 2026
  • IRS Transitions from First Time Abatement to Automated Penalty Relief: Strategic Impacts for Tax AdvisorsJuly 11, 2026
  • Parag Patel to Present on IRS Foreign Asset Enforcement at the 2026 NATP TaxposiumJuly 9, 2026

Law Firm Attorney WordPress Theme By Themespride