Skip to content
Tax Law Center Blog

Tax Law Center Blog

  • Tax & Foreign Assets
    • Tax Law Services
    • Foreign Asset Planning
  • About
  • Contact Us
Close Button

In Addition to HSBC, Credit Suisse Also Being Investigated for Offshore Activities

16 July, 2011

On July 14, 2011, Credit Suisse received a letter notifying it that it is a target of a Justice Department investigation.  A target letter is significant.  It likely means that a considerable level of investigation has already been done and further criminal investigation is warranted.  See Internal Revenue Manual, Part 9. Even before this stage a well-advised taxpayer  proceeds with great caution.

Credit Suisse is unlikely to be the only institution in the IRS’s sights.  It has been reported that U.S. authorities are conducting a broader industry inquiry.  Credit Suisse points out that it has obligations under Swiss law, and those are not small.  Credit Suisse says it will continue to cooperate with the U.S. authorities, subject to those rules.

HSBC is also being scrutinized. On April 7, 2011, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of  California issued an order authorizing the Internal Revenue Service  (“IRS”) to serve a “John Doe” summons requesting information from HSBC regarding U.S. residents who may be using accounts at HSBC in India to evade federal income taxes. If HSBC produces these records,  which is likely, it may be too late for U.S. taxpayers with undisclosed  HSBC accounts to take advantage of the IRS Voluntary Disclosure Program  for offshore accounts. The IRS says there are 9,000 high net worth Indian US residents who  maintain at least $100,000 in their bank accounts in HSBC India but only  1,921 of them have disclosed details of their accounts.  In a statement  to a San Francisco court, senior IRS official Daniel Reeves said, “This  indicates that thousands of US taxpayers of Indian origin who maintain  more than $100,000 in accounts with HSBC, may have failed to disclose  their HSBC India accounts to the United States Government.”  He went on  to say, “It is also likely that those taxpayers may have failed to  report income earned on those undisclosed accounts.”

The 2011 OVDI is still pending and allowing U.S. account holders to come clean under the IRS amnesty policy.  However, OVDI expires August 31, 2011, although it’s possible to ask the IRS for permission to extend the deadline for some materials until November 29, 2011.

Patel Law Offices is a law firm dedicated to helping clients resolve  complicated tax, criminal tax, and international tax problems. Our firm  assists (and defends) clients and their advisors to legally disclose  (and legitimize) foreign accounts.

Related Posts

  • What HSBC India Accountholders Can Expect From the IRS

    Our firm recently informally met with a US Department of Justice official (name withheld because…

  • HSBC Expected to Disclose Account Holders Names

    The IRS has petitioned for a federal court authorization to enable it to obtain information…

  • HSBC Client Pleads Guilty to Conspiring to Hide Indian Accounts From IRS

    An Indian-American businessman on Tuesday pleaded guilty to conspiring to defraud US tax authorities by…

Tags: amnestyAsset Protection FBAR foreign account offshore voluntary disclosure
Category: Planning for Tax Minimization

Post navigation

Previous: “Willfulness” When Deciding Whether to Opt Out of 2011 OVDI
Next: New Online System for Filing Your Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (FBAR)

Related Posts

US DOJ Tax Asst Attorney General Keneally Reports that One third of Swiss Banks Joining US DOJ Swiss Bank Program

We have previously posted on the U.S. Justice Department’s program…

Read More

Structuring: A Tax Crime

One of the most frequent criminal charges our firm encounters…

Read More

Required Minimum Distributions Suspended For Retirement Plans and IRAs For 2020

The bipartisan COVID-19 stimulus bill just signed by President Trump includes welcome…

Read More

Recent Posts

  • The Enforcement Surge: What the DOJ and IRS Campaign Means for Tax Professionals and Their ClientsOctober 17, 2026
  • The High Price of Payroll Tax Non-Compliance: Lessons from United States v. PittsSeptember 15, 2026
  • FBAR Willfulness, Recklessness, and the Excessive Fines Defense: Key Takeaways from United States v. RundSeptember 11, 2026
  • FBAR Enforcement and Penalty Analysis: United States v. NiksichSeptember 5, 2026
  • Billions Offshore, Millions Missed: What TIGTA’s Report Means for FATCA EnforcementSeptember 2, 2026
  • Criminal Tax Enforcement Takes Center Stage: The National Fraud Enforcement Division MemorandumAugust 21, 2026
  • Navigating New Jersey Tobacco and Vapor Excise Tax AuditsAugust 11, 2026
  • Navigating the US Estate Portability Election: Strategic Timing and Compliance Procedures for Form 706July 13, 2026
  • IRS Transitions from First Time Abatement to Automated Penalty Relief: Strategic Impacts for Tax AdvisorsJuly 11, 2026
  • Parag Patel to Present on IRS Foreign Asset Enforcement at the 2026 NATP TaxposiumJuly 9, 2026

Law Firm Attorney WordPress Theme By Themespride