Skip to content
Tax Law Center Blog

Tax Law Center Blog

  • Tax & Foreign Assets
    • Tax Law Services
    • Foreign Asset Planning
  • About
  • Contact Us
Close Button

New FATCA Enforcement Expected

4 September, 2016 Parag Patel 0 Comments 1 category

Parag P. Patel, Esq.By Parag P. Patel, Esq. | Updated August 30, 2016

The IRS has tightened its enforcement of the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (“FATCA”). FATCA was enacted in 2010 by Congress to target non-compliance by U.S. taxpayers using foreign accounts. FATCA requires foreign financial institutions (FFIs), i.e., foreign banks, to report to the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) information about financial accounts held by U.S. taxpayers, or by foreign entities in which U.S. taxpayers hold a substantial ownership interest. FATCA requires all U.S. paying agents to withhold tax, at a rate of 30 per cent, from payments of U.S. source income to non-U.S. persons who are classified as FFIs unless that FFI is located in a country which has entered into an intergovernmental agreement (“IGA”) with the IRS to report information on relevant account holders to the IRS.

An IGA is a bilateral agreement with the U.S. to simplify reporting compliance and avoid FATCA withholding. Since the implementation of FATCA, the IRS has permitted numerous nations to benefit from having status as IGA, even if they did not have a finalized IGA in force.

In IRS Announcement 2016-17, however, the IRS pressures nations that have been lagging on this process to substantially complete it by year-end, or risk their FFIs to be subject to the 30 percent withholding in coming years. Hence, foreign banks in jurisdictions that cease to be considered as having an IGA in effect will not be able to rely on the IGA and will have to enter into FFI agreements to comply with their FATCA obligations, including reporting information to the IRS and withholding.
Each country with an IGA that is not yet in force and that wishes to continue to be treated as having an IGA in effect must provide to Treasury by December 31, 2016, a detailed explanation of why the IGA is not yet in force and a plan (including dates) intended to be followed to sign the IGA.

This Announcement reflects the IRS’s aggressiveness to gather information on American-owned bank accounts in foreign nations, which has been repeatedly delayed due to the complexities that arose in the implementation of FATCA. The risk of the substantial withholding tax under FATCA for FFIs in non-IGA nations will incentivize lagging nations to sign IGAs. As a result, we expect many more nations to sign IGAs and start sharing bank information in the near future.

There are millions of Americans (citizens and green card holders) currently living overseas. Unlike almost every other tax regime in the world, the U.S. taxes Americans no matter where they live. Thus, every American should expect to have to file an annual tax return.

While many Americans have chosen not to stay tax-compliant while abroad, this choice is becoming increasingly risky and expensive. The following are excellent reasons Americans should remain compliant with the US Internal Revenue Service.

1. With the new Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA), you will likely be involuntarily discovered.
It has become more difficult to open or maintain a bank account overseas without having to sign an IRS Form W-9 or other U.S. tax-related documentation. This increasingly common bank procedure is a result of the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act, which requires foreign banks and other financial institutions, among other things, to gather and report information to the IRS about their U.S. customers or face stiff tax-withholding penalties on U.S. investments.
Many Americans have received letters from their bank advising them of the bank’s FATCA participation and reporting obligation. FATCA has left many with no choice but to stay compliant or come clean with the IRS if they are behind in their filings.

2. Staying tax-compliant doesn’t necessarily mean paying tax to the IRS.
While the U.S. government does not absolve Americans living abroad from filing tax returns, it does have some beneficial tax rules that often lead to no actual tax payment obligation. For instance, some people can use the Foreign Earned Income Exclusion to exclude foreign earned income (U.S. $101,300 for the 2016 tax year). Foreign Tax Credits can also be utilized to reduce or eliminate one’s U.S. tax payment obligation. However, is that in order to claim the Foreign Earned Income Exclusion or Foreign Tax Credit, you must timely file your U.S. income tax return.

3. Discovery of non-compliance means large penalties.
Tax delinquency can result in a punitive monetary penalties and, in some cases, even criminal penalties. In addition, under a recently enacted law, the State Department now has the authority to cancel your U.S. passport if your tax delinquency amount reaches a $50,000 threshold (to be adjusted in future years for inflation).

All of these potential consequences should give noncompliant Americans reasons to become compliant. Taxpayers who have failed to comply with their US tax filing and information reporting obligations should be aware of and seek appropriate legal counsel regarding which voluntary disclosure program(s) to pursue.

Parag P. Patel, Esq.About the Author

Parag P. Patel, Esq. brings over three decades of experience to individuals and businesses facing complex tax problems. Holding advanced degrees from Georgetown University Law Center (J.D.) and New York University School of Law (LL.M. in Tax Law), the nation’s top tax programs, Mr. Patel delivers sophisticated and creative strategies in complicated federal and state audits, penalty abatements, and foreign asset/income reporting. His practice emphasizes international tax matters, specifically foreign financial account reporting (FBAR), voluntary disclosures, and penalty defense.

Book a Paid Legal Consultation

Related Posts

  • India Expected to Sign FATCA Agreement Tomorrow

    India is expected to sign an inter-governmental agreement (IGA) for the US tax compliance law…

  • FATCA Enforcement Softens

    Realizing the large administrative burden of FATCA, the IRS has announced a "soft opening" of FATCA…

  • FATCAts

    If the US dollar is as close as we have come to a global currency…

Tags: FBARforeign account offshore accounts SDOP SFOP Streamlined Filing Compliance Procedures Streamlined Filing Compliance Procedures and the Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program tax crime voluntary disclosure
Category: Planning for Tax Minimization

Post navigation

Previous: Trinidad and Tobago and the United States sign new agreement to exchange of information under FATCA
Next: Resolving IRS disputes through audit reconsideration

Related Posts

HSBC India Customer New Indictment Uncovers More HSBC Details

A Wisconsin neurosurgeon was re- indicted by a U.S. grand…

Read More

Parag Patel Esq. speaks at NJCPA Tax Seminar: “Under the IRS Microscope: International Tax Reporting Update” and “What Tax Professionals Should Know About Trusts and Estates”

Parag Patel Esq. will be a featured speaker at a…

Read More

IRS Revises Delinquent International Information Return Submission Procedure (DIIRSP)

The IRS revised its Delinquent International Information Return Submission Procedure…

Read More

Recent Posts

  • The Enforcement Surge: What the DOJ and IRS Campaign Means for Tax Professionals and Their ClientsOctober 17, 2026
  • The High Price of Payroll Tax Non-Compliance: Lessons from United States v. PittsSeptember 15, 2026
  • FBAR Willfulness, Recklessness, and the Excessive Fines Defense: Key Takeaways from United States v. RundSeptember 11, 2026
  • FBAR Enforcement and Penalty Analysis: United States v. NiksichSeptember 5, 2026
  • Billions Offshore, Millions Missed: What TIGTA’s Report Means for FATCA EnforcementSeptember 2, 2026
  • Criminal Tax Enforcement Takes Center Stage: The National Fraud Enforcement Division MemorandumAugust 21, 2026
  • Navigating New Jersey Tobacco and Vapor Excise Tax AuditsAugust 11, 2026
  • Navigating the US Estate Portability Election: Strategic Timing and Compliance Procedures for Form 706July 13, 2026
  • IRS Transitions from First Time Abatement to Automated Penalty Relief: Strategic Impacts for Tax AdvisorsJuly 11, 2026
  • Parag Patel to Present on IRS Foreign Asset Enforcement at the 2026 NATP TaxposiumJuly 9, 2026

Search

Archives

  • October 2026
  • September 2026
  • August 2026
  • July 2026
  • June 2026
  • May 2026
  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • September 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • December 2006
  • July 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • March 2001
  • March 1999
  • February 1998
  • August 1996
  • July 1996

Meta

  • Log in

Categories

  • Estate Planning and Probate
  • Planning for Tax Minimization

Law Firm Attorney WordPress Theme By Themespride