Skip to content
Tax Law Center Blog

Tax Law Center Blog

  • Tax & Foreign Assets
    • Tax Law Services
    • Foreign Asset Planning
  • About
  • Contact Us
Close Button

New Much-Needed Guidance for Non-Willful FBAR violations

31 May, 2015

Last week, the Internal Revenue Service released interim guidance (SBSE-04-0515-0025) on foreign bank account report (FBAR) (also known as FinCen 114) penalties to improve the administration of the FBAR compliance program. The guidance contains amendments to the Internal Revenue Manual (IRM), effective immediately, and applies to all open cases in which the FBAR penalties are at issue. Examiners are required to implement these new procedures to help ensure consistent, effective and fair administration of the penalties. A Civil FBAR Penalty Case File Checklist is also included to further establish consistency in FBAR case file information.

We find that the guidance is much needed in light of the lack of uniformity in the IRS’ application of FBAR non-willful penalties.

The memo states that a non-willful penalty will not be recommended if the IRS determines that the FBAR violations were due to reasonable cause and the person later files correct and complete FBARs.

In regard to non-willful violations when there are multiple accounts, the memorandum indicates in most cases only one $10,000 penalty should be imposed in each year, not $10,000 per account. The memorandum also notes, however, that lesser penalties (e.g., only imposing the penalty in one year) or greater penalties (i.e., per account penalties) may be imposed when appropriate.

Attachment 1 of the memo states that if conditions for mitigation guidelines are met then:

“examiners should make a preliminary penalty calculation based upon the mitigation guidelines in IRM 4.26.16.4.6.2, except that the penalty for each year will be limited to $10,000. This is the penalty amount, unless the facts and circumstances of a case warrant a different penalty amount.

If the facts and circumstances of a case warrant a lower penalty amount, examiners, with the group manager’s approval after consultation with an Operating Division FBAR Coordinator, may assert a single penalty, not to exceed $10,000, for one year only.” (italics added for emphasis)

This clarifies the old punitive rule that could have been interpreted and applied as $10,000 per account per year.  This memo is clearly helpful to taxpayers, since it indicates that maximum penalties should be the exception not the default starting point.

While the IRS examiner has significant discretion this memo provides some much-needed guidance to taxpayers and examiners alike for FBAR penalties. Since the actual amount of the penalties is still largely determined based upon “facts and circumstances” there remains a significant opportunity for persuasive legal advocacy to minimize FBAR penalties.

Also, the memorandum notes that when accounts have co-owners, each shall be attributed the appropriate percentage ownership of the account balances in computing penalties. Co-owners of an unreported foreign financial account don’t necessarily have to be held jointly liable. Separate determinations must be made with respect to each co-owner as to whether there was a violation.

The interim guidance will be incorporated into IRM 4.26.16, Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (FBAR), and IRM 4.26.17,Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (FBAR) Procedures, no later than one year from the date of issuance.

 

Related Posts

  • New IRS Guidelines for Willful FBAR violations

    Last week, the Internal Revenue Service released interim guidance (SBSE-04-0515-0025) on foreign bank account report…

  • Helpful Non-willful FBAR penalty case decided by court

    For the first time, in the case of James Moore, Plaintiff v. United States of…

  • Argue for No Penalty and a Warning Letter for FBAR Violations

    The IRS may send a warning letter in lieu of asserting penalties for failure to…

Tags: FBARforeign account offshore offshore accounts OVDP voluntary disclosure
Category: Planning for Tax Minimization

Post navigation

Previous: Beware of U.S. tax consequences to a foreign trust with a U.S. beneficiary
Next: New IRS Guidelines for Willful FBAR violations

Related Posts

Is First-Time Abatement Applicable In International Penalty Cases?

The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) issued a memorandum from John…

Read More

The IRS Large Business and International division (LB&I) has announced a new Post OVDP Compliance enforcement campaign

The new Post OVDP Compliance enforcement campaign was recently identified…

Read More

Automatic Form 5471 and 5472 Penalties in Spotlight by 2020 National Taxpayer Advocate Report

IRS National Taxpayer Advocate yesterday released her 2020 annual report…

Read More

Recent Posts

  • New Penalty Landscape: Analyzing the October 2025 Updates to IRM 21.8.2.19.2 for Late-Filed Forms 3520May 27, 2026
  • Late Disclosure of Foreign Gift for Wedding Results in PenaltyMay 15, 2026
  • Kwong: Preserving Client Claims for COVID-Era Penalty and Interest RefundsMay 13, 2026
  • Internal Revenue Service’s Clarification on Reasonable Cause for Form 5472 PenaltiesMay 12, 2026
  • Defending the Cross-Border Client: Join Parag at the NJSEA Annual Conference This JuneMay 9, 2026
  • Navigating the Step Up in Basis: Core Rules, Critical Exceptions, and Strategic BenefitsMay 7, 2026
  • The Tax Consequences of Cross-Border Trusts: Key Reminders from the IRS April 2026 Comprehensive GuidanceMay 5, 2026
  • Advancing the Exclusion: “Packing and Stacking” Strategies Under IRC § 1202May 1, 2026
  • Navigating Foreign Trust Compliance: Key Takeaways from the IRS April 2026 Foreign Trust Guidance UpdateApril 30, 2026
  • Navigating the IRS First Time Abatement Policy: Mechanics, Eligibility, and ExceptionsMarch 28, 2026

Law Firm Attorney WordPress Theme By Themespride