The year 2009 was marked by many changes affecting estate planning and related areas on…
News from the 2014 Criminal Fraud and Tax Controversy Conference
We just returned last week from attending the Criminal Fraud and Tax Controversy Conference in Las Vegas, sponsored by the American Bar Association Section of Taxation where many government officials were in attendance. Below are some interesting observations:
On the new IRS Streamlined program (including the SDOP and SFOP programs), David Horton LB&I director for international compliance (who is in charge of the IRS Streamlined program), said that there are differences between the OVDP and Streamlined, particularly noting to Streamlined “requires a certification of non-willfulness, and a false certification could lead to possible criminal liability.”
Horton also indicated that he has a team in Austin, Texas for the IRS Streamlined program that is reviewing EVERY certification of non-willfulness. This seems contradictory to the IRS’ statement that not every Streamlined submission will be audited (perhaps the returns will not be audited but the certifications of non-willfulness will be carefully scrutinized.
On the certification statement of reasons for noncompliance, Horton said that a “conclusory statement” will not suffice and that there is not a “checklist on willfulness.” There was intentionally no statement on what a proper certification statement should include.
“He [Horton] warned of ‘a lot more John Doe summonses’ in the next 12 to 24 months, in other parts of the world and ‘beyond banks.’ The focus will be on intermediaries, he said, referring to those who promoted or facilitated transactions for stashing money abroad.”
Horton indicated that the IRS was aware of but did not have a current solution for the difficulty and delay of U.S. citizens abroad most of their lives not have as SSN and unable to get one in a decent time period, thus delaying their OVDP or Streamlined.
Horton also indicated that revised new FAQs for the Streamline program should be expected shortly.
In our experience, good facts applied to the law will result in a result. Legal research, careful drafting and legal advocacy of a taxpayer’s particular circumstances are still strongly recommended for a favorable result.
Patel Law Offices offers a strategy session to discuss how to resolve your legal problem. Conveniently schedule online today with our online scheduler and questionnaire.
Related Posts
- 2009 Year-End Estate Planning News
- 2012 Offshore Account Criminal Tax Cases
The Department of Justice continues to prosecute cases involving United States taxpayers who have failed to…
- Keeping Tax Papers
By Parag Patel, Esq.Keep anything related to your tax return for at least three years…
Search
Categories
Recent Posts
- US Supreme Court Will Favor Taxpayer Challenges to the IRS July 12, 2024
- Comments on Proposed Regulations on Transactions with Foreign Trusts and Reporting Large Foreign Gifts July 10, 2024
- IRS Form 8621 Frequently Misunderstood July 5, 2024
- IRS Criminal Investigations: A Serious Threat With Warning Signs July 2, 2024
- Handling an Unexpected Visit from IRS Criminal Investigation: Guidance for Taxpayers and Advisors June 28, 2024
- US Supreme Court Upholds Constitutionality of Repatriation Tax: Key Takeaways for Foreign Corporations June 26, 2024
- New NJ Law Makes it Easier to Transfer Motor Vehicle Ownership Upon Death June 25, 2024
- How to Respond or Contest an IRS Criminal Investigation Division (CID) Summons June 19, 2024
- IRS Criminal Investigation Division Summonses: A Key Tool in Tax Crime Investigations June 14, 2024
- Form 3520: A Comprehensive Guide to Navigating the Complexities of Foreign Gift Reporting Under the Latest 2024 Proposed Regulations June 4, 2024
- Detailed Technical Comments and Recommendations to the IRS on Proposed Regulations for Form 3520 and Code Section 6039F (REG-108066-22) June 2, 2024
- Top Six Criminal Tax Questions Asked May 27, 2024