Skip to content
Tax Law Center Blog

Tax Law Center Blog

  • Tax & Foreign Assets
    • Tax Law Services
    • Foreign Asset Planning
  • About
  • Contact Us
Close Button

Quiet or Silent Disclosure Commentary from the Government Accountability Office

29 April, 2013

The recent report from a government watchdog agency called the Government Accountability Office (GAO) shows how well the IRS attack on offshore tax evasion is coming. The GAO makes recommendations to the IRS, and the IRS pays attention. Those recommendations could put some taxpayers in trouble. Particularly concerning is the Quiet Disclosure commentary. Below is an excerpt from the report.

 

Despite the significant risks of not coming forward through one of IRS’s

offshore programs, some taxpayers decide to do nothing and remain

noncompliant. Other taxpayers have attempted to disclose their offshore

accounts without paying all the delinquent taxes, interest, and penalties

required by the programs. In a quiet disclosure, taxpayers file amended

tax returns for all or some of the tax years covered by an offshore

program, and report the income from the previously unreported accounts.

The taxpayers would generally pay interest and either accuracy-related or

delinquency penalties on the newly reported income, but would avoid the

higher offshore penalty.

At the same time, taxpayers attempting quiet

disclosures would file late FBARs, if they had not previously filed FBARs,

or amended FBARs, if they had, to disclose the offshore accounts that

they had not previously reported. Taxpayers might also try to circumvent

some of the taxes, interest, and penalties that would otherwise be owed

in offshore programs by reporting the existence of any offshore accounts

and any income from the accounts on their current year’s tax return,

without amending prior years’ returns. These taxpayers would also likely

disclose the existence of the accounts by filing FBARs for the current

calendar year. This filing would appear similar to the opening of a new

account. Such a taxpayer would avoid paying any delinquent taxes,

interest, or penalties, unless audited. As described earlier, taxpayers who

are caught disclosing offshore accounts outside of one of IRS’s offshore

programs risk steeper penalties and criminal prosecution, based on the

facts and circumstances of their cases.

 

Patel Law Offices has consulted with hundreds of clients regarding their offshore compliance issues, including Quiet Disclosures. Patel Law Offices is a law firm dedicated to helping clients resolve complicated tax, criminal tax, and international tax problems. Our firm assists (and defends) clients and their advisors to legally disclose (and legitimize) foreign accounts.

Related Posts

  • The "Quiet" or "Silent" Disclosure

    Our office consults with many clients in determining whether they need to enter into the…

  • To Opt Out or Not Opt Out: That is the Question

    When is it appropriate to make a quiet disclosure vs. making a disclosure through the…

  • Finally. Government Accountability Office makes recommendations to the IRS for tax laws education to immigrants

    In latest report from a government watchdog agency called the Government Accountability Office (GAO) the GAO makes recommendations to…

Tags: amnestyAsset Protection FBAR foreign account offshore accounts OVDP penalties and interest voluntary disclosure
Category: Planning for Tax Minimization

Post navigation

Previous: HSBC customer Josephine Bhasin Criminal Sentencing Very Light
Next: COURT AUTHORIZES SERVICE OF JOHN DOE SUMMONS SEEKING THE IDENTITIES OF U.S. TAXPAYERS WITH OFFSHORE ACCOUNTS AT CIBC FIRSTCARIBBEAN INTERNATIONAL BANK

Related Posts

New FBAR Deadline applies to 2016 Tax Year Onwards

On July 31, 2015, President Obama signed into law P.L.…

Read More

FBAR compared to Form 8938: Differences, Which to File, When to File, etc.

We receive many client queries regarding FBAR and Form 8938.…

Read More

Canada and US sign FATCA tax deal where banks to share information with IRS

Ottawa and Washington have reached a compromise over how to…

Read More

Recent Posts

  • The Enforcement Surge: What the DOJ and IRS Campaign Means for Tax Professionals and Their ClientsOctober 17, 2026
  • The High Price of Payroll Tax Non-Compliance: Lessons from United States v. PittsSeptember 15, 2026
  • FBAR Willfulness, Recklessness, and the Excessive Fines Defense: Key Takeaways from United States v. RundSeptember 11, 2026
  • FBAR Enforcement and Penalty Analysis: United States v. NiksichSeptember 5, 2026
  • Billions Offshore, Millions Missed: What TIGTA’s Report Means for FATCA EnforcementSeptember 2, 2026
  • Criminal Tax Enforcement Takes Center Stage: The National Fraud Enforcement Division MemorandumAugust 21, 2026
  • Navigating New Jersey Tobacco and Vapor Excise Tax AuditsAugust 11, 2026
  • Navigating the US Estate Portability Election: Strategic Timing and Compliance Procedures for Form 706July 13, 2026
  • IRS Transitions from First Time Abatement to Automated Penalty Relief: Strategic Impacts for Tax AdvisorsJuly 11, 2026
  • Parag Patel to Present on IRS Foreign Asset Enforcement at the 2026 NATP TaxposiumJuly 9, 2026

Law Firm Attorney WordPress Theme By Themespride