Skip to content
Tax Law Center Blog

Tax Law Center Blog

  • Tax & Foreign Assets
    • Tax Law Services
    • Foreign Asset Planning
  • About
  • Contact Us
Close Button

Received a FATCA Letter from Your Foreign Bank?

24 June, 2015 Parag Patel 0 Comments 1 category

Parag P. Patel, Esq.By Parag P. Patel, Esq. | Updated June 24, 2015

If you have any US connections and have a non-U.S. bank account, you may have recently received a letter from your bank asking for your tax information. This may seem odd or new to you but lately banks everywhere want to know if you are compliant with the IRS. Basically, the entire world is helping the IRS.

Since January of 2014, those holding accounts in foreign banks throughout the world have received Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) letters from their financial institutions. These letters are sent to account holders whom the institution believes have a link to the United States that would give rise to tax reporting and payment obligations.

A ‘FATCA letter’ is a letter from your foreign bank requesting certain information about your US tax status (and requesting you complete either a W-9 or W-8 form).  The letter usually also offers an incomplete discussion of the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) legislation) which requires the bank to share your name, address, and other account details with the IRS.

These letters will request that the recipient provide information regarding their disclosures, if any, to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). These disclosures typically include whether certain documents have been filed, including a Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (FBAR) and a 1040 personal return, and whether the individual has availed himself or herself of the Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program (OVDP) administered by the IRS to resolve tax compliance problems.

Below are some Frequently Asked Questions received from our clients:

Why did I receive a FATCA letter?

If you have received a FATCA letter, you may already be on the IRS’ radar. FATCA requires foreign banks to identify accounts with a link to the US A link could mean a US address, US telephone number, US residence, frequent transfers to/from the US, or any other evidence of a connection to the US.

Depending on the jurisdiction and the Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) that is in effect, the bank or qualifying financial institution may be required to submit this information to the IRS or face significant fines and penalties. Understanding the agreements in effect in your jurisdiction can help you better understand the risks you face.

How will my information reach the US government?

For FATCA purposes, there are two main models of IGAs: Model 1 IGAs and Model 2 IGAs. A Model 1 IGA is distinctive in that the banks can directly turn over an American account-holder’s information to the jurisdiction’s taxing authority. The foreign jurisdiction’s taxing authority will then pass that information along to the IRS.

In contrast, a Model 2 IGA, permits the direct transfer of information from the foreign bank or financial institution to the IRS. The IGA specific to your jurisdiction may also require special action for recalcitrant account holders or deem certain entities as “deemed-compliant foreign financial institutions” or “exempt beneficial owners.”

 

What are the potential consequences of FBAR non-compliance or other tax problems?

If a US taxpayer has failed to comply with his or her FATCA, FBAR, or other income tax reporting requirements, he or she could face significant penalties. When the non-compliant taxpayer’s account information is received by the IRS, he or she has likely already lost the right to participate in the various voluntary disclosure programs such as OVDP. A US taxpayer must avail themselves of the voluntary disclosure process prior to an investigation, or they will no longer potentially qualify for criminal amnesty or reduced civil fines.

Non-compliance with tax obligations can also lead to a civil tax action or criminal tax charges. A non-willful violation of FBAR obligations can result in a $10,000 fine for each violation. A willful FBAR violation can carry a penalty of the greater of $100,000 or 50% of the account balance for each violation. Criminal tax penalties can include significant prison sentences and fines that exceed the value of the accounts.

Contact Patel Law Offices if you have received a FATCA letter

If you have received a letter from your foreign bank or financial institution, it is not advisable to ignore it. By delaying action, you may eliminate certain voluntary disclosure options that could have led to a more favorable resolution than would be possible otherwise. Furthermore, if you have received a FATCA letter you are already on notice that your account is likely to attract further attention from the IRS.

If you have received such a letter, it is you must seek the advice of a tax legal professional. Failure to do so can result in significant civil penalties or a referral for criminal tax prosecution. Patel Law Offices can explain your legal situation and present potential solutions.

Parag P. Patel, Esq.About the Author

Parag P. Patel, Esq. brings over three decades of experience to individuals and businesses facing complex tax problems. Holding advanced degrees from Georgetown University Law Center (J.D.) and New York University School of Law (LL.M. in Tax Law), the nation’s top tax programs, Mr. Patel delivers sophisticated and creative strategies in complicated federal and state audits, penalty abatements, and foreign asset/income reporting. His practice emphasizes international tax matters, specifically foreign financial account reporting (FBAR), voluntary disclosures, and penalty defense.

Book a Paid Legal Consultation

Related Posts

  • IRS Most Common Tax Notices and What They Mean

    The IRS has redesigned its correspondence notices to be more “user friendly.”  This is supposed…

  • From Hong Kong With Love...

    We had many US clients this year with family in Hong Kong requesting legal assistance…

  • Foreign Gift Received: Form 3520 Penalties Eliminated in New Court Case

    The US DOJ Tax Division recently conceded penalties assessed against a police officer for failing…

Tags: amnestyfatca FBAR foreign account offshore offshore accounts OVDP
Category: Planning for Tax Minimization

Post navigation

Previous: BE-10 Report: A New Overlooked International Reporting Form
Next: Top 4 Exceptions to FBAR Filing Requirement

Related Posts

QSBS Changes Under the One Big Beautiful Bill Act

The "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" (OBBBA), enacted on July…

Read More

IRS offers tax opportunity to Americans living abroad

Many Americans (including US citizens and US green card holders)…

Read More

New IRS Voluntary disclosure program for employee retention credit

On August 15, 2024, the IRS introduced a second voluntary…

Read More

Recent Posts

  • The Enforcement Surge: What the DOJ and IRS Campaign Means for Tax Professionals and Their ClientsOctober 17, 2026
  • The High Price of Payroll Tax Non-Compliance: Lessons from United States v. PittsSeptember 15, 2026
  • FBAR Willfulness, Recklessness, and the Excessive Fines Defense: Key Takeaways from United States v. RundSeptember 11, 2026
  • FBAR Enforcement and Penalty Analysis: United States v. NiksichSeptember 5, 2026
  • Billions Offshore, Millions Missed: What TIGTA’s Report Means for FATCA EnforcementSeptember 2, 2026
  • Criminal Tax Enforcement Takes Center Stage: The National Fraud Enforcement Division MemorandumAugust 21, 2026
  • Navigating New Jersey Tobacco and Vapor Excise Tax AuditsAugust 11, 2026
  • Navigating the US Estate Portability Election: Strategic Timing and Compliance Procedures for Form 706July 13, 2026
  • IRS Transitions from First Time Abatement to Automated Penalty Relief: Strategic Impacts for Tax AdvisorsJuly 11, 2026
  • Parag Patel to Present on IRS Foreign Asset Enforcement at the 2026 NATP TaxposiumJuly 9, 2026

Search

Archives

  • October 2026
  • September 2026
  • August 2026
  • July 2026
  • June 2026
  • May 2026
  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • September 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • December 2006
  • July 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • March 2001
  • March 1999
  • February 1998
  • August 1996
  • July 1996

Meta

  • Log in

Categories

  • Estate Planning and Probate
  • Planning for Tax Minimization

Law Firm Attorney WordPress Theme By Themespride