Skip to content
Tax Law Center Blog

Tax Law Center Blog

  • Tax & Foreign Assets
    • Tax Law Services
    • Foreign Asset Planning
  • About
  • Contact Us
Close Button

Streamlined Procedures for U.S. Taxpayers Residing In the United States

27 August, 2014 Parag Patel 0 Comments 1 category

Parag P. Patel, Esq.By Parag P. Patel, Esq. | Updated August 27, 2014

Many of our clients are interested in the new Streamlined Filing Compliance Procedures, which were recently announced by the IRS. Therefore, we are providing more general information on the Procedures.

General Eligibility: The modified Streamlined Filing Compliance Procedures are designed for only individual taxpayers, including estates of individual taxpayers. The streamlined procedures are available to both U.S. individual taxpayers residing outside of the United States and U.S. individual taxpayers residing in the United States.

Taxpayers using either the Streamlined Foreign Offshore Procedures or the Streamlined Domestic Offshore Procedures will be required to certify that the failure to report all income, pay all tax and submit all required information returns, including FBARs, was due to non-willful conduct.

If the IRS has initiated a criminal investigation or a civil examination of a taxpayer’s returns, the taxpayer will not be eligible to use these procedures.

Taxpayers who have made “quiet disclosures” may still use the Streamlined Filing Compliance Procedures. However, any penalty assessments previously made with respect to those filings will not be abated.

Eligibility. In addition to having to meet the general eligibility criteria described above, individual U.S. taxpayers, or estates of individual U.S. taxpayers, seeking to use the Streamlined Domestic Offshore Procedures must:

  1. fail to meet the applicable non-residency requirement described above (for joint return filers, one or both of the spouses must fail to meet the applicable non-residency requirement);
  2. have previously filed a U.S. tax return (if required) for each of the most recent three years for which the U.S. tax return due date (or properly applied for extended due date) has passed;
  3. have failed to report gross income from a foreign financial asset and pay tax as required by U.S. law, and may have failed to file an FBAR and/or one or more international information returns with respect to the foreign financial asset; and
  4. such failures resulted from non-willful conduct.

Comment: It appears that the Domestic Streamlined Program is not available to non-filers.

Scope and Effect of Domestic Streamlined Procedures. U.S. taxpayers (U.S. citizens, lawful permanent residents and those meeting the “substantial presence” test) eligible to use the Streamlined Domestic Offshore Procedures must:

  1. for each of the most recent three years for which the U.S. tax return due date (or properly applied for extended due date) has passed (the “covered tax return period”), file amended tax returns, together with all required information returns;
  2. for each of the most recent six years for which the FBAR due date has passed (the “covered FBAR period”), file any delinquent FBARs;
  3. pay a miscellaneous offshore penalty;
  4. pay the full amount of the tax, interest and miscellaneous offshore penalty due in connection with these filings at the time the foregoing returns and FBAR are filed; and
  5. complete and sign a statement on the Certification by U.S. Person Residing in the U.S., certifying:
    (a) that the taxpayer is eligible for the Streamlined Domestic Offshore Procedures;
    (b) that all required FBARs have now been filed;
    (c) that the failure to report all income, pay all tax and submit all required information returns, including FBARs, resulted from non-willful conduct; and
    (d) that the miscellaneous offshore penalty amount is accurate.

It is important to note that a taxpayer may not file delinquent income tax returns (including Form 1040, U.S. Individual Income Tax Return) using these procedures.

The Miscellaneous Offshore Penalty is equal to 5 percent of the highest aggregate balance/value of the taxpayer’s foreign financial assets that are subject to the miscellaneous offshore penalty during the years in the covered tax return period and the covered FBAR period.

A foreign financial asset is subject to the 5-percent miscellaneous offshore penalty if:

  1. the asset should have been, but was not, reported on an FBAR for that year;
  2. the asset should have been, but was not, reported on a Form 8938 for that year; and
  3. the asset was properly reported for that year, but gross income in respect of the asset was not reported in that year.

It appears that rental property, business interests, and other income-generating assets that are not required to be reported on FBAR or Form 8938 are not subject to the 5% penalty.  This is a major difference from OVDp treatment of the same assets.

A participating taxpayer will be subject only to the 5-percent miscellaneous offshore penalty and will not be subject to accuracy-related penalties, information return penalties or FBAR penalties. Even if returns properly filed under these procedures are subsequently selected for audit, no such penalties will be imposed unless the examination results in a determination that the original return was fraudulent and/or that the FBAR violation was willful. Any previously assessed penalties with respect to those years, however, will not be abated.

For returns filed under these procedures, retroactive relief will be provided for failure to timely elect income deferral on certain retirement and savings plans where deferral is permitted by the applicable treaty.

Parag P. Patel, Esq.About the Author

Parag P. Patel, Esq. brings over three decades of experience to individuals and businesses facing complex tax problems. Holding advanced degrees from Georgetown University Law Center (J.D.) and New York University School of Law (LL.M. in Tax Law), the nation’s top tax programs, Mr. Patel delivers sophisticated and creative strategies in complicated federal and state audits, penalty abatements, and foreign asset/income reporting. His practice emphasizes international tax matters, specifically foreign financial account reporting (FBAR), voluntary disclosures, and penalty defense.

Book a Paid Legal Consultation

Related Posts

  • New Streamlined Domestic Offshore Procedures (SDOP) is a Game Changer

    The IRS has announced a Streamlined Domestic Offshore Procedures (SDOP), which will significantly alter all…

  • Solution: Streamlined Domestic Offshore Procedures

    In the midst of tough tax season, many U.S taxpayers are unfortunately surprised to discover…

  • US Entities with foreign assets have more information reporting

    The US Treasury has issued long-awaited regulations specifying the domestic taxpayers who have to disclose…

Tags: amnestyAsset Protection FBAR foreign account OVDP SDOP SFOP Streamlined Filing Compliance Procedures Streamlined Filing Compliance Procedures and the Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program
Category: Planning for Tax Minimization

Post navigation

Previous: IRS Official Provides Insights for the new IRS Streamlined Compliance Procedures
Next: New IRS internal procedure guidance for Streamline Filing Compliance Procedures

Related Posts

Seminar: Navigating Foreign Waters: The Complex Requirements of Foreign Accounts Compliance on US tax laws

With the IRS aggressively targeting taxpayers with unreported offshore accounts, tax professionals…

Read More

New law complicates US Passport issuance

Pending legislation, H.R. 22 called Developing a Reliable and Innovative…

Read More

Parag Patel Esq. Speaks at NJCPA Seminar on”Criminal Tax: What Tax Professionals Need to Know to Help Clients and Themselves”

Parag Patel Esq. will be a featured speaker this month…

Read More

Recent Posts

  • The Enforcement Surge: What the DOJ and IRS Campaign Means for Tax Professionals and Their ClientsOctober 17, 2026
  • The High Price of Payroll Tax Non-Compliance: Lessons from United States v. PittsSeptember 15, 2026
  • FBAR Willfulness, Recklessness, and the Excessive Fines Defense: Key Takeaways from United States v. RundSeptember 11, 2026
  • FBAR Enforcement and Penalty Analysis: United States v. NiksichSeptember 5, 2026
  • Billions Offshore, Millions Missed: What TIGTA’s Report Means for FATCA EnforcementSeptember 2, 2026
  • Criminal Tax Enforcement Takes Center Stage: The National Fraud Enforcement Division MemorandumAugust 21, 2026
  • Navigating New Jersey Tobacco and Vapor Excise Tax AuditsAugust 11, 2026
  • Navigating the US Estate Portability Election: Strategic Timing and Compliance Procedures for Form 706July 13, 2026
  • IRS Transitions from First Time Abatement to Automated Penalty Relief: Strategic Impacts for Tax AdvisorsJuly 11, 2026
  • Parag Patel to Present on IRS Foreign Asset Enforcement at the 2026 NATP TaxposiumJuly 9, 2026

Search

Archives

  • October 2026
  • September 2026
  • August 2026
  • July 2026
  • June 2026
  • May 2026
  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • September 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • December 2006
  • July 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • March 2001
  • March 1999
  • February 1998
  • August 1996
  • July 1996

Meta

  • Log in

Categories

  • Estate Planning and Probate
  • Planning for Tax Minimization

Law Firm Attorney WordPress Theme By Themespride