Skip to content
Tax Law Center Blog

Tax Law Center Blog

  • Tax & Foreign Assets
    • Tax Law Services
    • Foreign Asset Planning
  • About
  • Contact Us
Close Button

New Report: Delinquent Taxpayers Could be Identified at US Border Crossings

19 October, 2014

The Internal Revenue Service’s collection efforts need to be improved to make sure that delinquent taxpayers residing in foreign countries comply with their U.S. tax obligations, according to a new government report. The report, from the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA), comes amid the implementation of many of the requirements of the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act, or FATCA, which will require foreign financial institutions to begin reporting on the holdings of U.S. taxpayers to the IRS or else face stiff penalties of up to 30 percent on their income from U.S. sources.

TIGTA’s review found that ineffective management oversight has contributed to a number of control weaknesses in the IRS’s International Collection program. The review also discovered that the IRS does not have reliable statistics on the rate of noncompliance of taxpayers with their U.S. tax obligations.

In addition, there is no process to measure the value of the so-called “Customs Hold” as an enforcement tool against delinquent international taxpayers. International revenue officers at the IRS can request that a customs hold be input into the Treasury Enforcement Communication System for delinquent taxpayers, and the U.S. Department of Homeland Security will then notify the IRS whenever the taxpayer travels into the U.S. During TIGTA’s interviews with a sample of 15 international revenue officers and all five group managers, many identified the Customs Hold as one of the most effective enforcement tools available to them in dealing with delinquent international taxpayers. International revenue officers use information obtained through a Customs Hold to attempt to contact the taxpayers while they are in the U.S. or to locate the taxpayers’ assets.

In addition, there are over 78,000 global financial institutions that have entered into direct information exchange agreements with the IRS. These institutions will be issuing FATCA letters to U.S. taxpayers asking them to provide information required under FATCA. The failure to provide the information will result in the taxpayers being place on a FATCA “recalcitrant” list. The financial institutions will also withhold 30% of the U.S. taxpayers account earnings and remit those earning to the IRS.

Our firm expects that the Customs Hold will be used on a more now that the Swiss bank non-prosecution program participation deadline of September 15, 2014 has passed. U.S. taxpayers who have been placed on the “recalcitrant” list should expect tax audit letters and FBAR “willfulness” based assessments.

For those taxpayers who would like to come forward, the IRS has two solutions: First, for those taxpayers who qualify there are the Streamline Procedures (non-resident SFOP and domestic SDOP). For those taxpayers who do not meet the eligibility requirements of the Streamline Procedures there is the offshore voluntary disclosure program (OVDP 2014).

Related Posts

  • IRS Reminds (again) Taxpayers to Report Foreign Income and Assets

    Earlier this month on April 11, 2014, the Internal Revenue Service issued Notice IR-2014-52 reminding U.S. citizens…

  • IRS delinquent FBAR submission procedure

    Last spring, the IRS revised its program for delinquent FBAR returns. The IRS offers a…

  • Taxpayers Advised to Use Caution: Confirmed FBAR Information Request Scam

    Our firm has become aware of a “phishing” scam, related to the filing of Report of…

Tags: foreign accounthsbc offshore offshore accounts opt out ovdi penalties and interest SFOP Streamlined Filing Compliance Procedures
Category: Planning for Tax Minimization

Post navigation

Previous: IRS Clarifies Requirements for Streamlined Filing Procedures
Next: IRS Releases FAQs for the Delinquent International Information Return Submission Procedures

Related Posts

Accountant-Client vs Attorney-Client Confidentiality

Both Accountant-Client vs Attorney-Client Confidentiality are designed to protect the…

Read More

The Tax Consequences of Cross-Border Trusts: Key Reminders from the IRS April 2026 Comprehensive Guidance

As the Internal Revenue Service continues to expand its enforcement…

Read More

How to Benefit from Tax Treaties

Paying taxes twice on the same income is a concern…

Read More

Recent Posts

  • New Penalty Landscape: Analyzing the October 2025 Updates to IRM 21.8.2.19.2 for Late-Filed Forms 3520May 27, 2026
  • Late Disclosure of Foreign Gift for Wedding Results in PenaltyMay 15, 2026
  • Kwong: Preserving Client Claims for COVID-Era Penalty and Interest RefundsMay 13, 2026
  • Internal Revenue Service’s Clarification on Reasonable Cause for Form 5472 PenaltiesMay 12, 2026
  • Defending the Cross-Border Client: Join Parag at the NJSEA Annual Conference This JuneMay 9, 2026

Pages

  • About Patel Law Offices
  • Delinquent FinCen Form 114 (FBAR) Filings
  • Delinquent or unfiled IRS Form 5471

Law Firm Attorney WordPress Theme By Themespride