Skip to content
Tax Law Center Blog

Tax Law Center Blog

  • Tax & Foreign Assets
    • Tax Law Services
    • Foreign Asset Planning
  • About
  • Contact Us
Close Button

Details of the Streamlined Foreign Offshore Procedures (SFOP)

19 July, 2019 Parag Patel 0 Comments 1 category

Parag P. Patel, Esq.By Parag P. Patel, Esq. | Updated August 17, 2021

Many U.S taxpayers are unfortunately surprised to discover that they have a U.S. tax reporting obligation on financial accounts or assets held overseas. Once they discover their tax and reporting obligation, there are a number of programs through which they can become compliant. One option, if the taxpayers meet the requirements, is to file under the Streamlined Domestic Offshore Procedures (SDOP) or the Streamlined Foreign Offshore Procedures (SFOP).  This article focuses on the SFOP.

The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) recently modified the non-willfulness certification form that individual taxpayers must submit to enroll in the streamlined filing compliance procedures (SFCP).  SFCP is a program offered by the IRS to individuals who have not previously disclosed foreign assets to the U.S. government.

The IRS introduced SFCP in June 2014 for taxpayers who non-willfully failed to disclose foreign assets. Under the SFCP, non-willful conduct is specifically defined as “conduct that is due to negligence, inadvertence, or mistake or conduct that is the result of a good faith misunderstanding of the requirements of the law”.

The most important first step in analyzing whether a taxpayer is eligible to participate in the streamlined procedures is to ascertain whether the taxpayer’s compliance failure, including the failure to file an FBAR, was actually non-willful. The IRS has defined “nonwillful conduct” as “conduct that is due to negligence, inadvertence, or mistake or conduct that is the result of a good faith misunderstanding of the requirements of the law.”

It is extremely important that a taxpayer’s eligibility is carefully analyzed because once the SFCP is elected and the taxpayer claims the violations were non-willful. There are possible risk factors that need to be considered and analyzed such as the evidence of willfulness including intent of laws, knowledge and violations. Although filing an SFCP does not automatically select the taxpayer for an IRS audit, the taxpayers is still subject to the possible normal audit selection. The taxpayer needs to be prepared to defend filing a SFCP and be able to demonstrate their non-willfulness.

The IRS has two separate tracks for taxpayers wishing to enter in the SFCP: one track for taxpayers who reside in the United States (hereinafter “Streamline Domestic Offshore Procedure (SDOP)”) and another track for taxpayers who reside outside the United States (hereinafter “Streamline Foreign Offshore Procedure (SFOP)”).

The eligibility requirements for the separate tracks have some notable variations.  The threshold eligibility inquiry is the taxpayer’s residency.  A taxpayer will be treated as not residing in the United States if, in any one or more of the most recent three years for which the U.S. tax return due date (or properly applied for extended due date) has passed, the taxpayer did not have a U.S. abode and the taxpayer was physically outside the United States for at least 330 full days.

If the taxpayer meets the non-residency test, then the taxpayer may enter the Streamline Foreign Offshore Procedure (SFOP), provided the taxpayer can certify that: (1) he or she failed to report income from a foreign financial asset and pay tax as required by U.S. law [and may have failed to file a report of foreign bank and financial accounts (FBAR)]; and (2) such failures resulted from non-willful conduct.

If a taxpayer can certify that he or she meets the eligibility requirements, then the taxpayer may make a voluntary disclosure as part of the SFCP program.  The SFOP requires the taxpayer to submit, in addition to filing any delinquent FBARs for each of the most recent six years for which the FBAR due date has passed:

(1) delinquent or amended or new tax returns, together with all required information returns for each of the most recent three years for which the U.S. tax return due date (or properly applied for extended due date has passed);

(2) the full amount of the tax and interest due in connection with the delinquent or amended returns; and

(3) a completed and signed Certification by U.S. Person Residing Outside of the U.S. (Form 14653).  Taxpayers who enter the SFOP are NOT subject to any penalties (i.e., failure-to-file and failure-to-pay penalties, accuracy-related penalties, information return penalties, FBAR penalties, or a Title 26 miscellaneous offshore penalty).  There simply is no penalty, which is a great uncommon result for non-compliant taxpayers.

Taxpayers in the SFOP must submit Form 14653 (Certification by U.S. Person Residing Outside the United States for Streamlined Foreign Offshore Procedures).  As part of such certification, the taxpayer must provide specific facts and reasons (generally on a signed attachment) why their conduct was non-willful.

In February 2016, the IRS revised Form 14653 and added a section to Form 14653 requesting detailed information regarding presence outside the U.S. during the streamlined procedures submission period.  The IRS now requires that U.S. citizens or lawful permanent residents indicate whether they were physically outside the United States for each year in the covered three-year period. Also, for joint submissions, the IRS states that both spouses filing a joint certification must meet the non-residency requirement. If the number of days physically outside of the United States differs for each spouse, then each spouse needs to disclose that on the chart on the Form 14653 or in an attachment thereto.

Also in October 2017, the IRS revised Form 14653 to require more disclosure.  Now the IRS also instructs the taxpayer to:

Provide specific reasons for your failure to report all income, pay all tax, and submit all required information returns,
including FBARs. Include the whole story including favorable and unfavorable facts. Specific reasons, whether favorable or
unfavorable to you, should include your personal background, financial background, and anything else you believe is
relevant to your failure to report all income, pay all tax, and submit all required information returns, including FBARs.
Additionally, explain the source of funds in all of your foreign financial accounts/assets. For example, explain whether you
inherited the account/asset, whether you opened it while residing in a foreign country, or whether you had a business reason
to open or use it. And explain your contacts with the account/asset including withdrawals, deposits, and investment/
management decisions. Provide a complete story about your foreign financial account/asset. If you relied on a professional
advisor, provide the name, address, and telephone number of the advisor and a summary of the advice. If married taxpayers
submitting a joint certification have different reasons, provide the individual reasons for each spouse separately in the
statement of facts. (italics added)

This is the fourth revision to this form in the last 4 years. The revision indicates that the IRS is receiving many incomplete disclosures. In fact, our law firm has cleaned up many rejected incomplete or inadequate SFCP non-willful certifications. As a result of the revision, the IRS is requesting the “whole story” in exhaustive detail.  The revision poses a very delicate balance for our advocacy for our clients:  we need to share enough information in order to persuasively demonstrate non-willfulness, including unfavorable facts and circumstances, however excessive disclosure could lead to new questions and complications.

Whether a taxpayer’s conduct is non-willful is a critical question of fact and law, based largely on the taxpayer’s particular facts and circumstances. While the streamlined program offers a welcome option for many taxpayers with undeclared accounts, other ways to address past noncompliance remain viable, including the OVDP program and Delinquent FBAR Submission Procedures and Delinquent International Information Return Submission Procedures. The analysis to enter the one program versus other alternative options is complex and requires full legal analysis by a competent experienced tax attorney.

Our firm presented an informational webinar on the Streamlined Filing Compliance Procedures. Materials from the webinar can be downloaded here: Game Changer Streamline.

Patel Law Offices has consulted with hundreds of clients regarding their offshore asset and income compliance issues. Patel Law Offices is a law firm dedicated to helping clients resolve complicated tax, criminal tax, and international tax problems. Our firm assists (and defends) clients and their advisors to legally disclose (and legitimize) foreign assets.

Parag P. Patel, Esq.About the Author

Parag P. Patel, Esq. brings over three decades of experience to individuals and businesses facing complex tax problems. Holding advanced degrees from Georgetown University Law Center (J.D.) and New York University School of Law (LL.M. in Tax Law), the nation’s top tax programs, Mr. Patel delivers sophisticated and creative strategies in complicated federal and state audits, penalty abatements, and foreign asset/income reporting. His practice emphasizes international tax matters, specifically foreign financial account reporting (FBAR), voluntary disclosures, and penalty defense.

Book a Paid Legal Consultation

Related Posts

  • Streamlined Filing Compliance Procedure's New Revisions to Streamlined Foreign Offshore Procedures (SFOP)

    In the midst of tough tax season, many U.S taxpayers are unfortunately surprised to discover…

  • Streamlined Filing Compliance Procedure's New Revisions to Streamlined Domestic Offshore Procedures (SDOP)

    In the midst of tough tax season, many U.S taxpayers are unfortunately surprised to discover…

  • How to Demonstrate Non-Willfulness Under The Streamlined Filing Compliance Procedures

    The IRS recently announced Streamlined Filing Compliance Procedures in an effort to encourage U.S. taxpayers…

Tags: amnestyFBAR foreign account offshore accounts SFOP Streamlined Filing Compliance Procedures voluntary disclosure
Category: Planning for Tax Minimization

Post navigation

Previous: The IRS Large Business and International division (LB&I) has announced a new Offshore Private Banking enforcement campaign
Next: The IRS Large Business and International division (LB&I) has announced a new Loose Filed Forms 5471 compliance enforcement campaign

Related Posts

Correcting Common FBAR Errors

The IRS offers four options to fix FBAR mistakes. Participation…

Read More

Recent Webcast to DC Bar Association on Post-Election Estate Planning and Audits: Tax Considerations For the Unexpected

Parag Patel last month co-presented a Tax Law Webcast to…

Read More

ABA COMMENTS ON THE 2014 OFFSHORE VOLUNTARY DISCLOSURE PROGRAM AND THE STREAMLINED PROGRAMS

We are members of the American Bar Association Section of Taxation,…

Read More

Recent Posts

  • The Enforcement Surge: What the DOJ and IRS Campaign Means for Tax Professionals and Their ClientsOctober 17, 2026
  • The High Price of Payroll Tax Non-Compliance: Lessons from United States v. PittsSeptember 15, 2026
  • FBAR Willfulness, Recklessness, and the Excessive Fines Defense: Key Takeaways from United States v. RundSeptember 11, 2026
  • FBAR Enforcement and Penalty Analysis: United States v. NiksichSeptember 5, 2026
  • Billions Offshore, Millions Missed: What TIGTA’s Report Means for FATCA EnforcementSeptember 2, 2026
  • Criminal Tax Enforcement Takes Center Stage: The National Fraud Enforcement Division MemorandumAugust 21, 2026
  • Navigating New Jersey Tobacco and Vapor Excise Tax AuditsAugust 11, 2026
  • Navigating the US Estate Portability Election: Strategic Timing and Compliance Procedures for Form 706July 13, 2026
  • IRS Transitions from First Time Abatement to Automated Penalty Relief: Strategic Impacts for Tax AdvisorsJuly 11, 2026
  • Parag Patel to Present on IRS Foreign Asset Enforcement at the 2026 NATP TaxposiumJuly 9, 2026

Search

Archives

  • October 2026
  • September 2026
  • August 2026
  • July 2026
  • June 2026
  • May 2026
  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • September 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • December 2006
  • July 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • March 2001
  • March 1999
  • February 1998
  • August 1996
  • July 1996

Meta

  • Log in

Categories

  • Estate Planning and Probate
  • Planning for Tax Minimization

Law Firm Attorney WordPress Theme By Themespride