Skip to content
Tax Law Center Blog

Tax Law Center Blog

  • Tax & Foreign Assets
    • Tax Law Services
    • Foreign Asset Planning
  • About
  • Contact Us
Close Button

Eleven foreign financial institutions to share their US customer account information

25 March, 2012 Parag Patel 0 Comments 1 category

Parag P. Patel, Esq.By Parag P. Patel, Esq. | Updated March 25, 2012

US authorities have offered eleven financial institutions a settlement agreement in which the US government’s investigations in those financial institutions — for aiding tax evasion — and potential prosecution would be dropped.

The eleven financial institutions are:

1. Credit Suisse (including Clariden Leu)

2. HSBC Holdings

3. Basler Kantonalbank

4. Wegelin & Co

5. Zuercher Kantonalbank

6. Julius Baer Group

7. Bank Leumi Le-Israel

8. Bank Hapoalim

9. Mizrahi-Tefahot Bank

10. Liechtensteinische Landesbank

11. Neue Zuercher Bank (NZB)

The terms of the US government agreement would be similar to the UBS settlement in 2009 and would require each of the eleven  financial institutions to share client data regarding US citizens and, most likely, pay a hefty fine. American officials are also concerned that these 11 banks appear to have accepted hidden money from American clients who fled UBS in the wake of its scrutiny. The scrutiny comes during a wide-ranging campaign by the Department of Justice to force nearly a dozen Swiss banks now under scrutiny to pay billions of dollars in fines collectively and to admit to criminal wrongdoing.

Handing Over Client Data

The IRS reported that eight Swiss banks, including Credit Suisse, Julius Baer, and Basler Kantonalbank turned over US client data on taxpayers suspected of tax evasion on January 30th, 2012. This does not put an end to the negotiations between the US and Swiss governments. Three more banks are still expected to turn over client data and a total of 11 banks are expected to pay heavy fines. Based on the settlement in 2009 with UBS it appears that the banks would need to turn over, at the very least, the following:

1. Correspondence between the banks and US clients (which includes notes made during telephone conversations and meetings);

2. Internal memoranda relating to US clients;

3. Correspondence between the Banks and third parties concerning US clients; and

4. Documents related to funds transferred to third parties on behalf of US clients.

 

Global Pursuit

The known countries involved in the US government’s far-reaching investigations include:

1. Switzerland

2. Liechtenstein

3. Israel

4. India

5. Singapore

6. Hong Kong

The risk of criminal and/or substantial civil penalties grows greater as the IRS and Department of Justice complete more bank-investigations and as foreign banks continue to co-operate with US government officials.

Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program (OVDP)

On January 9th, 2012, the IRS re-opened its Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program (OVDP) to encourage US taxpayers with undisclosed offshore accounts to come into compliance. The 2012 Amnesty Program is in response to continuing interest from US taxpayers after the 2009 and 2011 programs ended, making this program the third in the past three years. With the renewal of a third Voluntary Disclosure Program it seems clear that the IRS is dedicated to providing taxpayers with opportunities to come forward, which is something that US taxpayers with undisclosed offshore accounts are being urged strongly to consider in light of the recent developments. In parallel, the DoJ’s tax division continues its aggressive mission to obtain bank record information on US citizen’s offshore accounts around the world. As they describe it, the “top litigation priority is the concerted civil and criminal effort to combat the serious problem of non-compliance with our tax laws by US taxpayers using secret offshore bank accounts.”

Conclusion

The IRS and the Department of Justice’s tax division have made it clear that they are intent on taking the secret out of secret bank accounts and will prosecute anyone involved: tax payer, banker or professional advisor such as legal attorney. The risk of the IRS discovering a taxpayer’s undisclosed offshore accounts has increased manifold with far reaching bank investigations. The consequences for failure to comply with the proper disclosure and filing requirements may lead to audits, severe financial penalties, and in some cases, criminal prosecution. The US government is committed to bringing all US taxpayers with undisclosed offshore accounts into compliance regardless of the consequences for the off-shore banking industry. The European and Asian governments may follow suit in the footsteps of the US tax authorities.

Our law firm expects unabated aggressive enforcement of the US tax laws, including increased criminal prosecutions and civil audit examinations. We have been advising our clients to expect the unexpected (and the worst) in their tax treatment and disclosure of offshore assets.

Patel Law Offices is a law firm dedicated to helping clients resolve complicated tax, criminal tax, and international tax problems. Our firm assists (and defends) clients and their advisors to legally disclose (and legitimize) foreign accounts.

Parag P. Patel, Esq.About the Author

Parag P. Patel, Esq. brings over three decades of experience to individuals and businesses facing complex tax problems. Holding advanced degrees from Georgetown University Law Center (J.D.) and New York University School of Law (LL.M. in Tax Law), the nation’s top tax programs, Mr. Patel delivers sophisticated and creative strategies in complicated federal and state audits, penalty abatements, and foreign asset/income reporting. His practice emphasizes international tax matters, specifically foreign financial account reporting (FBAR), voluntary disclosures, and penalty defense.

Book a Paid Legal Consultation

Related Posts

  • Is HSBC the next UBS nightmare?

    clients with a foreign HSBC account should be seriously concerned about disclosure of the account…

  • Another Bank Discloses Accountholders: Credit Suisse to Turn Over U.S. Account Data

    Earlier this month Credit Suisse Group AG, Switzerland’s second-biggest bank, told U.S. clients it is…

  • Numerous Criminal Prosecutions of Taxpayers with Unreported Offshore Accounts

    The Department of Justice and local United States Attorneys’ Offices continue to zealously prosecute numerous…

Tags: amnestyAsset Protection FBAR foreign account hsbc offshore offshore accounts OVDP penalties and interest ubs voluntary disclosure
Category: Planning for Tax Minimization

Post navigation

Previous: The Teeth of the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA)
Next: Frequent Scenarios in Offshore Voluntary Disclosures

Related Posts

First Indictment for FATCA Violation Announced

Federal prosecutors charged six men Tuesday with running a complicated…

Read More

Information Sharing of Account Holder Information Officially Begins

The IRS has begun receiving information regarding tax year 2014…

Read More

Laws May Cause Issues for Owners In Civil Unions

When civil unions became legal for same-sex couples in New…

Read More

Recent Posts

  • The Enforcement Surge: What the DOJ and IRS Campaign Means for Tax Professionals and Their ClientsOctober 17, 2026
  • The High Price of Payroll Tax Non-Compliance: Lessons from United States v. PittsSeptember 15, 2026
  • FBAR Willfulness, Recklessness, and the Excessive Fines Defense: Key Takeaways from United States v. RundSeptember 11, 2026
  • FBAR Enforcement and Penalty Analysis: United States v. NiksichSeptember 5, 2026
  • Billions Offshore, Millions Missed: What TIGTA’s Report Means for FATCA EnforcementSeptember 2, 2026
  • Criminal Tax Enforcement Takes Center Stage: The National Fraud Enforcement Division MemorandumAugust 21, 2026
  • Navigating New Jersey Tobacco and Vapor Excise Tax AuditsAugust 11, 2026
  • Navigating the US Estate Portability Election: Strategic Timing and Compliance Procedures for Form 706July 13, 2026
  • IRS Transitions from First Time Abatement to Automated Penalty Relief: Strategic Impacts for Tax AdvisorsJuly 11, 2026
  • Parag Patel to Present on IRS Foreign Asset Enforcement at the 2026 NATP TaxposiumJuly 9, 2026

Search

Archives

  • October 2026
  • September 2026
  • August 2026
  • July 2026
  • June 2026
  • May 2026
  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • September 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • December 2006
  • July 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • March 2001
  • March 1999
  • February 1998
  • August 1996
  • July 1996

Meta

  • Log in

Categories

  • Estate Planning and Probate
  • Planning for Tax Minimization

Law Firm Attorney WordPress Theme By Themespride