Skip to content
Tax Law Center Blog

Tax Law Center Blog

  • Tax & Foreign Assets
    • Tax Law Services
    • Foreign Asset Planning
  • About
  • Contact Us
Close Button

HSBC Customer Avoids Jail in Tax Evasion Case

23 May, 2013 Parag Patel 0 Comments 1 category

Parag P. Patel, Esq.By Parag P. Patel, Esq. | Updated May 23, 2013

A New Jersey businessman who cooperated with prosecutors avoided prison after admitting he conspired with five HSBC Holdings bankers to hide his Indian bank accounts from U.S. tax authorities.

Vaibhav Dahake, 46, was sentenced to one year of probation yesterday in federal court in Trenton, where he pleaded guilty in April 2011. Prosecutors said he played a vital role in helping gather information about London-based HSBC, the largest European bank by assets.  Absent his cooperation, Dahake would have likely been sentenced to some jail time.  The U.S. is probing whether HSBC India helped Americans hide money from the Internal Revenue Service.

Publicity over Dahake’s case helped spur 33,000 Americans with accounts at various banks to avoid prosecution through an IRS amnesty program and to pay $5 billion in taxes, federal prosecutor Scott McBride told U.S. District Judge Freda Wolfson. The program lets taxpayers repatriate assets by paying back taxes and penalties, and disclosing offshore accounts and bankers.

Dahake’s cooperation “revealed many others that were involved in acting in a similar fashion in a very large scheme involving these undeclared bank accounts in India,” Wolfson said. “The extent of his cooperation was virtually unparalleled in similar tax matters.”

Dahake, of Somerset, New Jersey, faced as long as five years in prison. U.S. prosecutors cited Dahake’s indictment in April 2011 in persuading a federal judge in California to allow the IRS to serve a so-called John Doe summons on HSBC for information about Americans with accounts in India.

First Charged

Dahake was the first taxpayer charged in a crackdown focusing on those HSBC India accounts. He admitted he conspired with two bankers in New York, one in Fremont, California, and two in Thane, India.

Since 2008, prosecutors charged at least 86 people in their crackdown on offshore tax evasion, including two dozen bankers, lawyers and advisers. Several HSBC clients were charged.

McBride said Dahake was “certainly the right guy at the right time for this large-scale investigation.” Before his indictment, he was debriefed extensively, providing “many documents and much information that was extremely useful to us.”

Dahake first laid out details of the scheme to prosecutors on Oct. 13, 2010, and signed a cooperation agreement a month later. Dahake later made surreptitious phone recordings and agreed to be indicted to spur publicity.

Before he was sentenced, Dahake apologized to the judge and the IRS. Dahake had previously paid $2.3 million in back taxes, fines and penalties.

In Dahake’s indictment, prosecutors said the bank operated a U.S. division called NRI Services that marketed offshore-banking services to U.S. citizens of Indian descent. Through NRI, the HSBC “encouraged U.S. citizens to open undeclared bank accounts in India,” according to the indictment.

Dahake, a native of India who became a U.S. citizen in 2006, filed false tax returns that hid ownership of, and income from, undeclared accounts in India, as well as the British Virgin Islands, according to the indictment.

His British Virgin Islands accounts didn’t pay interest, and the bank solicited him to open accounts in India that paid “high interest rates,” according to the indictment.

In 2001, he met with a banker in New York who touted the advantages of an Indian account, “including that no U.S. forms were required, he did not have to provide a Social Security number, the account was not taxable in India” and no Form 1099 reporting the interest income would be filed with the IRS, according to the indictment.

In transferring funds, the banker advised, Dahake should send multiple checks in the amount of $10,000 rather than one large one so that he could “stay below the radar,” according to the indictment.

Two other U.S. bankers also told him that the bank wouldn’t file 1099 forms with the IRS, according to the indictment. In another instance, Dahake was talking with a banker in Fremont and asked if the bank would issue 1099 forms, according to the document. The banker stopped speaking in English and said in Hindi that Dahake shouldn’t discuss the forms on the phone, according to the indictment.

HSBC closed its NRI offices in New York and Fremont in 2010, according to the bank.

Dahake clearly provided the government useful information that will lead to more prosecutions. While new criminal prosecutions start and continue, our law firm expects unabated aggressive enforcement of the US tax laws, including increased criminal prosecutions and civil audit examinations. We have been advising our clients to expect the unexpected (and the worst) in their tax treatment and disclosure of offshore assets.

Patel Law Offices has consulted with hundreds of clients regarding their offshore compliance issues. Patel Law Offices is a law firm dedicated to helping clients resolve complicated tax, criminal tax, and international tax problems. Our firm assists (and defends) clients and their advisors to legally disclose (and legitimize) foreign accounts.

 

Parag P. Patel, Esq.About the Author

Parag P. Patel, Esq. brings over three decades of experience to individuals and businesses facing complex tax problems. Holding advanced degrees from Georgetown University Law Center (J.D.) and New York University School of Law (LL.M. in Tax Law), the nation’s top tax programs, Mr. Patel delivers sophisticated and creative strategies in complicated federal and state audits, penalty abatements, and foreign asset/income reporting. His practice emphasizes international tax matters, specifically foreign financial account reporting (FBAR), voluntary disclosures, and penalty defense.

Book a Paid Legal Consultation

Related Posts

  • Foreign HSBC Bank Customer Avoids Jail: Given Three Years' Probation

    A Wisconsin neurosurgeon convicted of tax charges related to a HSBC bank accounts owned abroad…

  • IRS Targets Non-Resident Indians with HSBC Accounts

    HSBC, one of the largest banks international banks in the world, is facing rough time…

  • First Indictment for FATCA Violation Announced

    Federal prosecutors charged six men Tuesday with running a complicated offshore scheme that allegedly enabled…

Tags: amnestyAsset Protection FBAR foreign account hsbc ovdi OVDP penalties and interest tax crime voluntary disclosure
Category: Planning for Tax Minimization

Post navigation

Previous: HSBC Bank Expects Significant Penalties from US Government for Violations
Next: Finally: IRS Reminds Those with Foreign Assets of U.S. Tax Obligations

Related Posts

$3.5 Million Federal Estate Tax Exemption for 2009 Could Mean Higher State Death Taxes

  The federal estate tax exemption increases from $2 million…

Read More

Tax Advisors: New Jersey Man Pleads Guilty to Tax Evasion Through Asset Concealment

Tax advisors should take note of the guilty plea last…

Read More

Foreign HSBC Bank Customer Avoids Jail: Given Three Years’ Probation

A Wisconsin neurosurgeon convicted of tax charges related to a…

Read More

Recent Posts

  • The Enforcement Surge: What the DOJ and IRS Campaign Means for Tax Professionals and Their ClientsOctober 17, 2026
  • The High Price of Payroll Tax Non-Compliance: Lessons from United States v. PittsSeptember 15, 2026
  • FBAR Willfulness, Recklessness, and the Excessive Fines Defense: Key Takeaways from United States v. RundSeptember 11, 2026
  • FBAR Enforcement and Penalty Analysis: United States v. NiksichSeptember 5, 2026
  • Billions Offshore, Millions Missed: What TIGTA’s Report Means for FATCA EnforcementSeptember 2, 2026
  • Criminal Tax Enforcement Takes Center Stage: The National Fraud Enforcement Division MemorandumAugust 21, 2026
  • Navigating New Jersey Tobacco and Vapor Excise Tax AuditsAugust 11, 2026
  • Navigating the US Estate Portability Election: Strategic Timing and Compliance Procedures for Form 706July 13, 2026
  • IRS Transitions from First Time Abatement to Automated Penalty Relief: Strategic Impacts for Tax AdvisorsJuly 11, 2026
  • Parag Patel to Present on IRS Foreign Asset Enforcement at the 2026 NATP TaxposiumJuly 9, 2026

Search

Archives

  • October 2026
  • September 2026
  • August 2026
  • July 2026
  • June 2026
  • May 2026
  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • September 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • December 2006
  • July 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • March 2001
  • March 1999
  • February 1998
  • August 1996
  • July 1996

Meta

  • Log in

Categories

  • Estate Planning and Probate
  • Planning for Tax Minimization

Law Firm Attorney WordPress Theme By Themespride