Skip to content
Tax Law Center Blog

Tax Law Center Blog

  • Tax & Foreign Assets
    • Tax Law Services
    • Foreign Asset Planning
  • About
  • Contact Us
Close Button

IRS Announces New Investigative Units

7 November, 2017 Parag Patel 0 Comments 1 category

Parag P. Patel, Esq.By Parag P. Patel, Esq. | Updated December 7, 2017

In a press call on August 2, 2017, the Chief of the Internal Revenue Service’s (IRS) Criminal Investigation Division (“IRS-CI” or CID), John D. Fort, announced two new enforcement initiatives: a National Coordinated Investigations Unit and an International Tax Enforcement Group. Fort also explained that the Criminal Investigation division is—and will be—increasingly focusing on the use of cryptocurrencies.

Nationally Coordinated Investigations Unit

The Nationally Coordinated Investigations Unit (“NCIU”) is responsible for overseeing all IRS field offices, and coordinating major investigations at a national level. The unit will initially be focusing on four areas: (i) employment tax, (ii) international tax enforcement, (iii) microcap stock fraud (coordinating enforcement with the Securities and Enforcement Commission), and (iv) fuel excise tax. The NCIU will be using data analytics to identify areas of non-compliance, and select criminal investigations.

The units are intended to modernize CID’s investigative tools to rely more upon data analytics to harvest leads from information received through the Swiss Banking Program, the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) and the Panama Papers investigation, among other sources. The effort is also clearly intended to maximize the Division’s resources in light of budgetary concerns.

International Tax Enforcement Group

The International Tax Enforcement Group (“ITEG”) is dedicated to developing significant international tax investigations, building on the NCIU’s focus on international tax enforcement. ITEG will also be using data analytics, to leverage data compiled from both internal and external sources. In particular, the IRS has been scouring its data collected from Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (“FATCA”) reporting, the Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program (“OVDP”), and the Swiss Bank Program, and analyzing data published by whistleblowers, including the Panama Papers and other sources. Despite IRS budget cuts, IRS is also maintaining a physical presence internationally, with IRS attachés on the ground in Barbados, Bogota, Frankfurt, The Hague (Europol headquarters), Hong Kong, London, Mexico City, Ottawa, Panama City, and Sydney. These IRS attachés are responsible for coordinating with foreign governments and law enforcement agencies, and assisting with information exchanges pursuant to the Tax Information Exchange Agreement (“TIEA”), Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty (“MLAT”), and other tax treaties.

The number of IRS international investigations—and indictments—have increased significantly since 2015: International investigations initiated have increased from 186 in 2015, to 221 initiated in 2016, to 270 initiated as of the end of August 2017. Indictments have correspondingly increased, from 166 in 2015, to 187 in 2016, to 201 as of the end of August 2017. The IRS is targeting both institutions and individuals; individuals targeted include both bankers as well as foreign account holders. Courts are imposing increasingly heavy monetary fines, and even prison sentences.

Individuals have been increasingly targeted through a two-fold increase in FBAR penalty cases between 2016 and 2017. IRS-CI believes that many taxpayers are not complying with foreign reporting requirements. For example, even though the Department of State estimates that between 3 and 9 million taxpayers reside internationally, only a fraction of these taxpayers are reporting foreign income and foreign taxes paid: only approximately 350,000 returns report foreign income, and approximately 970,000 report foreign tax credits. Although FBAR filings continue to increase, in 2015, just over 1 million FBARs were filed. The International Tax Enforcement Group is leading IRS efforts to bring taxpayers who have not yet been coaxed into voluntary disclosure programs or making so-called “quiet” disclosures out of hiding.

Cryptocurrencies

The IRS also has been increasingly focused on gathering data regarding cryptocurrencies, sending a John Doe summons to Coinbase, Inc. seeking information on holders of Bitcoin. The IRS has independently stated that it has begun using software “to identify and obtain evidence on individuals using bitcoin to either launder money or conceal income as part of tax fraud or other Federal crimes,” according to the contract between the IRS and Chinanalysis, Inc., the provider of the software. Based on the date of the contract, the IRS has been using this software since July of 2015. These proactive initiatives by the IRS are likely to result in increased scrutiny, while allowing the IRS to maximize its resources.

 

The new National Coordinated Investigation Units have the potential to reinvigorate and sharpen CID’s investigative efforts in the United States and for taxpayers abroad. Particularly in the area of undeclared offshore accounts, voluntary disclosure is strongly advisable.For individual taxpayers, this announcement is yet another indication that a “wait and see” mentality when it comes to non-disclosure of offshore financial assets, or tax non-compliance more generally, is too risky. The days of hiding offshore assets are over. Taxpayers confronting these problems should carefully evaluate all of their options, including voluntary disclosure, in light of CID’s recent announcement.

Taxpayers who have unreported assets, whether offshore or in the form of cryptocurrencies, are advised to take proactive action now. Simply hoping that these efforts will pass them by is increasingly unlikely as the IRS will begin using more advance data-gathering techniques. Typically, applying to the OVDP, if eligible, is the best path—other options, including “quiet” disclosure where a taxpayer simply files amended returns and hopes the IRS will accept them, is risky and increasingly ineffective. For those holding unreported cryptocurrencies, OVDP may still be an option, as most cryptocurrencies can be considered to be held offshore.

Parag P. Patel, Esq.About the Author

Parag P. Patel, Esq. brings over three decades of experience to individuals and businesses facing complex tax problems. Holding advanced degrees from Georgetown University Law Center (J.D.) and New York University School of Law (LL.M. in Tax Law), the nation’s top tax programs, Mr. Patel delivers sophisticated and creative strategies in complicated federal and state audits, penalty abatements, and foreign asset/income reporting. His practice emphasizes international tax matters, specifically foreign financial account reporting (FBAR), voluntary disclosures, and penalty defense.

Book a Paid Legal Consultation

Related Posts

  • John Doe Summons: A potent investigative tool used by the IRS

    The John Doe summons is a powerful investigative tool employed by the IRS to uncover…

  • Understanding the IRS Emphasis on BSA Filings in Tax Crime Investigations

    The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) places significant emphasis on the role of Bank Secrecy Act…

  • New IRS Subpoenae and IRS Data Mining Expected

    Last week a federal judge approved the IRS issuing “John Doe” summonses requiring FedEx, DHL,…

Tags: FBARforeign account offshore accounts Streamlined Filing Compliance Procedures Streamlined Filing Compliance Procedures and the Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program voluntary disclosure
Category: Planning for Tax Minimization

Post navigation

Previous: Taxpayer Tips: Best Practices for U. S. Tax Court
Next: IRS Notice CP 503: IRS Second Notice of Balance Due: What to Do

Related Posts

Beware: India to sign FATCA agreement with US for sharing of information

Earlier this week, the Indian Cabinet, chaired by Prime Minister Narendra…

Read More

Protective Filing of Information Returns

There is an increased focus by the Internal Revenue Service…

Read More

IRS Reminds U.S. citizens and dual citizens about U.S. filing requirements

In a fact sheet (IRS FS-2011-13) released last week, the…

Read More

Recent Posts

  • The Enforcement Surge: What the DOJ and IRS Campaign Means for Tax Professionals and Their ClientsOctober 17, 2026
  • The High Price of Payroll Tax Non-Compliance: Lessons from United States v. PittsSeptember 15, 2026
  • FBAR Willfulness, Recklessness, and the Excessive Fines Defense: Key Takeaways from United States v. RundSeptember 11, 2026
  • FBAR Enforcement and Penalty Analysis: United States v. NiksichSeptember 5, 2026
  • Billions Offshore, Millions Missed: What TIGTA’s Report Means for FATCA EnforcementSeptember 2, 2026
  • Criminal Tax Enforcement Takes Center Stage: The National Fraud Enforcement Division MemorandumAugust 21, 2026
  • Navigating New Jersey Tobacco and Vapor Excise Tax AuditsAugust 11, 2026
  • Navigating the US Estate Portability Election: Strategic Timing and Compliance Procedures for Form 706July 13, 2026
  • IRS Transitions from First Time Abatement to Automated Penalty Relief: Strategic Impacts for Tax AdvisorsJuly 11, 2026
  • Parag Patel to Present on IRS Foreign Asset Enforcement at the 2026 NATP TaxposiumJuly 9, 2026

Search

Archives

  • October 2026
  • September 2026
  • August 2026
  • July 2026
  • June 2026
  • May 2026
  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • September 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • December 2006
  • July 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • March 2001
  • March 1999
  • February 1998
  • August 1996
  • July 1996

Meta

  • Log in

Categories

  • Estate Planning and Probate
  • Planning for Tax Minimization

Law Firm Attorney WordPress Theme By Themespride