Skip to content
Tax Law Center Blog

Tax Law Center Blog

  • Tax & Foreign Assets
    • Tax Law Services
    • Foreign Asset Planning
  • About
  • Contact Us
Close Button

New IRS practice unit: “Substantial compliance” doctrine, international information return penalties

29 June, 2017 Parag Patel 0 Comments 1 category

Parag P. Patel, Esq.By Parag P. Patel, Esq. | Updated June 20, 2017

The IRS Large Business and International (LB&I) division last week publicly released a “practice unit” that addresses what the term “substantially complete” means with reference to international information return penalties, particularly Form 5471.

The IRS recently released a new International Practice Unit (“IPU”) on failures to file form 5471.  IPUs are meant to act as a guide for IRS examiners and give insight to taxpayers as to how the IRS will evaluate certain tax situations.  The unit specifically deals with penalties associated with Internal Revenue Code § 6038, which assess a $10,000 penalty when certain forms are filed late, substantially incomplete, or not filed at all.  Though the IPU specifically relates to Form 5471, Form 5472 is subject to the same penalties under the same code provision.

Form 5471 is filed by U.S. taxpayers with respect to certain interests and transactions related to their ownership in foreign corporations.  Conversely, Form 5472 is filed by either U.S. corporations with some foreign owners or a foreign corporation which engages in a U.S. trade or business.  The Form 5472 filing obligation is triggered by certain transactions.

The IPU focuses specifically on what information qualifies Form 5471 as being “substantially complete.”  It is important to note that neither the Internal Revenue Code nor the Treasury Regulations define “substantially complete” for the purposes of Form 5471, but the IPU does provide situations and examples to illustrate the concept.

The IPU is available on the IRS practice unit webpage (release date of June 19, 2017).

Substantial compliance doctrine

International information returns must be substantially complete in order for the filer to have met its filing requirement. However, the terms “substantially complete” and “substantially incomplete” are not defined in the Code or regulations.

As noted in the practice unit, if the filer of an information return did not submit a substantially complete return, then penalties under sections 6038, 6038A, and 6046 may apply. The practice unit provides informal guidance for IRS agents examining a U.S. entity with foreign ownership or foreign-owned U.S. businesses, for purposes of determining whether the required international information return is substantially complete so that the filing requirement is met.

The practice unit begins by explaining the substantial compliance doctrine—a judicial concept that applies to certain tax returns, elections, and the substantiation of certain deductions. In some cases, courts require strict compliance with the statutory or regulatory requirements, but in other situations, the courts will accept substantial compliance. While the concept of substantially complete has not been the subject of judicial review, the body of case law concerning the substantial compliance doctrine provides guidance as to how a court may interpret whether an international information return is substantially complete. This background can be applied to supplement existing informal guidance on substantial completeness or, when the IRS has not provided specific informal guidance, this background can suggest a general approach for the IRS agent to follow.

Tax professionals have observed that the practice unit released today provides valuable insight into the IRS viewpoint on application of the substantial compliance doctrine, and the meaning of “substantially complete” for purposes of imposing penalties related to international information return obligations and associated filing requirements. In this practice unit, the IRS discusses these terms and instructs agents how to interpret and apply them—specifically with regard to Form 5471 and Form 5472 filing obligations—and notes how these principles might apply to other international information return penalties. The practice unit also provides guidance regarding when a strict compliance requirement is to apply. Taxpayers with international information return obligations might find it helpful to review this practice unit.

When completing Forms 5471 and 5472 it is imperative to provide all necessary information so that the form will be considered “substantially complete.”  If the form is filed but it is deemed not “substantially complete,” the taxpayer may be subject to a $10,000 penalty for each form filed which is not “substantially complete.”

Parag P. Patel, Esq.About the Author

Parag P. Patel, Esq. brings over three decades of experience to individuals and businesses facing complex tax problems. Holding advanced degrees from Georgetown University Law Center (J.D.) and New York University School of Law (LL.M. in Tax Law), the nation’s top tax programs, Mr. Patel delivers sophisticated and creative strategies in complicated federal and state audits, penalty abatements, and foreign asset/income reporting. His practice emphasizes international tax matters, specifically foreign financial account reporting (FBAR), voluntary disclosures, and penalty defense.

Book a Paid Legal Consultation

Related Posts

  • Substantially Completed Form 5471 is Required to be Filed

    IRS has recently released a new International Practice Unit (IPU) providing guidance to its examiners…

  • New IRS FBAR Practice Unit

    The IRS LB&I recently issued its Practice Unit on FBARs.  Practice Units are “job aids”…

  • Enforcement Update: Form 5471 Penalties

    The IRS continues to aggressively enforce penalties related to Form 5471, one of the most…

Tags: 5471amnesty Asset Protection FBAR foreign account Streamlined Filing Compliance Procedures
Category: Planning for Tax Minimization

Post navigation

Previous: U.S. Taxpayers at New Risk of Audit from OVDP Declines and Withdrawals Campaign
Next: IRS Releases New IRS Form W8-BEN: U.S. persons beware of completing such form at the request of a third party

Related Posts

The IRS Large Business and International division (LB&I) has announced a new Offshore Private Banking enforcement campaign

The new Offshore Private Banking enforcement campaign was recently identified…

Read More

New Escalating Wave of PPP Enforcement: Key Takeaways for New Jersey Employers and Tax Professionals

The enforcement landscape surrounding the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) has…

Read More

Two-day educational event focused on Trusts and Estate taxation

Parag Patel Esq. was a featured speaker at the National…

Read More

Recent Posts

  • The Enforcement Surge: What the DOJ and IRS Campaign Means for Tax Professionals and Their ClientsOctober 17, 2026
  • The High Price of Payroll Tax Non-Compliance: Lessons from United States v. PittsSeptember 15, 2026
  • FBAR Willfulness, Recklessness, and the Excessive Fines Defense: Key Takeaways from United States v. RundSeptember 11, 2026
  • FBAR Enforcement and Penalty Analysis: United States v. NiksichSeptember 5, 2026
  • Billions Offshore, Millions Missed: What TIGTA’s Report Means for FATCA EnforcementSeptember 2, 2026
  • Criminal Tax Enforcement Takes Center Stage: The National Fraud Enforcement Division MemorandumAugust 21, 2026
  • Navigating New Jersey Tobacco and Vapor Excise Tax AuditsAugust 11, 2026
  • Navigating the US Estate Portability Election: Strategic Timing and Compliance Procedures for Form 706July 13, 2026
  • IRS Transitions from First Time Abatement to Automated Penalty Relief: Strategic Impacts for Tax AdvisorsJuly 11, 2026
  • Parag Patel to Present on IRS Foreign Asset Enforcement at the 2026 NATP TaxposiumJuly 9, 2026

Search

Archives

  • October 2026
  • September 2026
  • August 2026
  • July 2026
  • June 2026
  • May 2026
  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • September 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • December 2006
  • July 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • March 2001
  • March 1999
  • February 1998
  • August 1996
  • July 1996

Meta

  • Log in

Categories

  • Estate Planning and Probate
  • Planning for Tax Minimization

Law Firm Attorney WordPress Theme By Themespride