Skip to content
Tax Law Center Blog

Tax Law Center Blog

  • Tax & Foreign Assets
    • Tax Law Services
    • Foreign Asset Planning
  • About
  • Contact Us
Close Button

New IRS practice unit: “Substantial compliance” doctrine, international information return penalties

29 June, 2017

The IRS Large Business and International (LB&I) division last week publicly released a “practice unit” that addresses what the term “substantially complete” means with reference to international information return penalties, particularly Form 5471.

The IRS recently released a new International Practice Unit (“IPU”) on failures to file form 5471.  IPUs are meant to act as a guide for IRS examiners and give insight to taxpayers as to how the IRS will evaluate certain tax situations.  The unit specifically deals with penalties associated with Internal Revenue Code § 6038, which assess a $10,000 penalty when certain forms are filed late, substantially incomplete, or not filed at all.  Though the IPU specifically relates to Form 5471, Form 5472 is subject to the same penalties under the same code provision.

Form 5471 is filed by U.S. taxpayers with respect to certain interests and transactions related to their ownership in foreign corporations.  Conversely, Form 5472 is filed by either U.S. corporations with some foreign owners or a foreign corporation which engages in a U.S. trade or business.  The Form 5472 filing obligation is triggered by certain transactions.

The IPU focuses specifically on what information qualifies Form 5471 as being “substantially complete.”  It is important to note that neither the Internal Revenue Code nor the Treasury Regulations define “substantially complete” for the purposes of Form 5471, but the IPU does provide situations and examples to illustrate the concept.

The IPU is available on the IRS practice unit webpage (release date of June 19, 2017).

Substantial compliance doctrine

International information returns must be substantially complete in order for the filer to have met its filing requirement. However, the terms “substantially complete” and “substantially incomplete” are not defined in the Code or regulations.

As noted in the practice unit, if the filer of an information return did not submit a substantially complete return, then penalties under sections 6038, 6038A, and 6046 may apply. The practice unit provides informal guidance for IRS agents examining a U.S. entity with foreign ownership or foreign-owned U.S. businesses, for purposes of determining whether the required international information return is substantially complete so that the filing requirement is met.

The practice unit begins by explaining the substantial compliance doctrine—a judicial concept that applies to certain tax returns, elections, and the substantiation of certain deductions. In some cases, courts require strict compliance with the statutory or regulatory requirements, but in other situations, the courts will accept substantial compliance. While the concept of substantially complete has not been the subject of judicial review, the body of case law concerning the substantial compliance doctrine provides guidance as to how a court may interpret whether an international information return is substantially complete. This background can be applied to supplement existing informal guidance on substantial completeness or, when the IRS has not provided specific informal guidance, this background can suggest a general approach for the IRS agent to follow.

Tax professionals have observed that the practice unit released today provides valuable insight into the IRS viewpoint on application of the substantial compliance doctrine, and the meaning of “substantially complete” for purposes of imposing penalties related to international information return obligations and associated filing requirements. In this practice unit, the IRS discusses these terms and instructs agents how to interpret and apply them—specifically with regard to Form 5471 and Form 5472 filing obligations—and notes how these principles might apply to other international information return penalties. The practice unit also provides guidance regarding when a strict compliance requirement is to apply. Taxpayers with international information return obligations might find it helpful to review this practice unit.

When completing Forms 5471 and 5472 it is imperative to provide all necessary information so that the form will be considered “substantially complete.”  If the form is filed but it is deemed not “substantially complete,” the taxpayer may be subject to a $10,000 penalty for each form filed which is not “substantially complete.”

Related Posts

  • Substantially Completed Form 5471 is Required to be Filed

    IRS has recently released a new International Practice Unit (IPU) providing guidance to its examiners…

  • New IRS FBAR Practice Unit

    The IRS LB&I recently issued its Practice Unit on FBARs.  Practice Units are “job aids”…

  • Enforcement Update: Form 5471 Penalties

    The IRS continues to aggressively enforce penalties related to Form 5471, one of the most…

Tags: 5471amnesty Asset Protection FBAR foreign account Streamlined Filing Compliance Procedures
Category: Planning for Tax Minimization

Post navigation

Previous: U.S. Taxpayers at New Risk of Audit from OVDP Declines and Withdrawals Campaign
Next: IRS Releases New IRS Form W8-BEN: U.S. persons beware of completing such form at the request of a third party

Related Posts

Passive Foreign Investment Company Tax & Mark-to-Market (MTM) election

A PFIC is a passive foreign investment company. One of…

Read More

Swiss Bank Disclosure Round Up

A host of Swiss banks have signaled their readiness to…

Read More

FBAR compared to Form 8938: Differences, Which to File, When to File, etc.

We receive many client queries regarding FBAR and Form 8938.…

Read More

Recent Posts

  • The Enforcement Surge: What the DOJ and IRS Campaign Means for Tax Professionals and Their ClientsOctober 17, 2026
  • The High Price of Payroll Tax Non-Compliance: Lessons from United States v. PittsSeptember 15, 2026
  • FBAR Willfulness, Recklessness, and the Excessive Fines Defense: Key Takeaways from United States v. RundSeptember 11, 2026
  • FBAR Enforcement and Penalty Analysis: United States v. NiksichSeptember 5, 2026
  • Billions Offshore, Millions Missed: What TIGTA’s Report Means for FATCA EnforcementSeptember 2, 2026
  • Criminal Tax Enforcement Takes Center Stage: The National Fraud Enforcement Division MemorandumAugust 21, 2026
  • Navigating New Jersey Tobacco and Vapor Excise Tax AuditsAugust 11, 2026
  • Navigating the US Estate Portability Election: Strategic Timing and Compliance Procedures for Form 706July 13, 2026
  • IRS Transitions from First Time Abatement to Automated Penalty Relief: Strategic Impacts for Tax AdvisorsJuly 11, 2026
  • Parag Patel to Present on IRS Foreign Asset Enforcement at the 2026 NATP TaxposiumJuly 9, 2026

Law Firm Attorney WordPress Theme By Themespride