Skip to content
Tax Law Center Blog

Tax Law Center Blog

  • Tax & Foreign Assets
    • Tax Law Services
    • Foreign Asset Planning
  • About
  • Contact Us
Close Button

Top 10 factors to consider before deciding to opt out of OVDI or OVDP

9 October, 2012 Parag Patel 0 Comments 1 category

Parag P. Patel, Esq.By Parag P. Patel, Esq. | Updated October 9, 2012

While opting out of the OVDI or OVDP amnesty programs may result in a reduction of penalties that may otherwise be assessed, the taxpayer needs to carefully weigh the numerous consequences before doing so. Responsible tax professionals should discuss the consequences of opting out with the client before making such a recommendation.

Opting out of OVDI or OVDP is irrevocable. Therefore, the taxpayer must only do so when it is clear that this course of action will produce a better result, considering all facts and circumstances. Pursuant to FAQ 51 of OVDI and OVDP, the taxpayer can opt out of the program at any time before signing the final closing agreement with the IRS.

In the process of deliberating with the IRS agent assigned to a submission made under OVDI or OVDP, the IRS will be in a position to gauge the strength of the taxpayer’s reasonable cause argument, which will in turn influence the taxpayer’s decision to opt out or stay in OVDI or OVDP. Therefore, you should wait to opt out until after the taxpayer has had a chance to confer with the IRS agent assigned to his case.

Factors that the taxpayer must consider before deciding to opt out include the following:

1. OVDI and OVDP provide the taxpayer with certainty with respect to the magnitude of the penalties to be assessed and assurance that such penalties will not be greater than could otherwise be applied (including penalties related to significant US tax and reporting deficiencies for tax years prior to 2009). Opting out could expose the taxpayer to additional penalties.

2. Protection from the risk of criminal prosecution if they remain in the OVDI and OVDP. If there is a chance of a willfulness finding, you should probably stay in in the OVDI and OVDP.

3. The OVDI and OVDP do not permit the taxpayer to use the “reasonable cause” defense to the application of penalties. However, remaining in the programs (at least for the time being) the taxpayer could try to “test the waters” with the IRS during the OVDI and OVDP examination process for the purpose of gauging the quality of his “reasonable cause” arguments for the full abatement of all penalties.

4. When the taxpayer’s OVDI or OVDP submission has been examined he will receive a Form 906 closing letter from the IRS which will close the statute of limitations on all returns and forms filed under OVDP or OVDI. Absent the closing letter, the statute of limitations will typically expire after 3 years in many cases and 6 years in other cases.

5. The extra cost of professional fees required to opt out and whether such fees outweigh the benefits of doing so. It makes no sense to start a fight over $1000 if the fight will cost $5000.

6. The extra time of opting out could lengthen your case for many more months (or years). If the stress of the process is intolerable, the shorter process may be preferred.

7. OVDI and OVDP require the taxpayer to prepare of 8 years of returns, however if the taxpayer opts out and is audited he may be required to prepare several additional years of returns.

8. There are risks from an audit. If you have other issues that can be discovered then OVDI (which typically focuses only on offshore asset/income issues) may be preferred.

9. Your confidence in your tax attorney. Experience matters. Even though every case is different, tax attorneys overseeing a large number of OVDI cases will have greater case-based experience (and opportunity) to compare your possible opt-out outcome to others.

10. Sympathy of your case. A well drafted opt out letter strategically presents the legal arguments carefully woven with the facts of your case to sympathetically portray your case as one with no or low penalties.

Patel Law Offices has consulted with hundreds of clients regarding their offshore assets. Patel Law Offices is a law firm dedicated to helping clients resolve complicated tax, criminal tax, and international tax problems. Our firm assists (and defends) clients and their advisors to legally disclose (and legitimize) foreign accounts.

Parag P. Patel, Esq.About the Author

Parag P. Patel, Esq. brings over three decades of experience to individuals and businesses facing complex tax problems. Holding advanced degrees from Georgetown University Law Center (J.D.) and New York University School of Law (LL.M. in Tax Law), the nation’s top tax programs, Mr. Patel delivers sophisticated and creative strategies in complicated federal and state audits, penalty abatements, and foreign asset/income reporting. His practice emphasizes international tax matters, specifically foreign financial account reporting (FBAR), voluntary disclosures, and penalty defense.

Book a Paid Legal Consultation

Related Posts

  • Opting-out or Opting-in of OVDI

    The IRS last week explained fully the possibility of opting-out of the OVDI and taxpayers’…

  • "Willfulness" When Deciding Whether to Opt Out of 2011 OVDI

    The IRS recently posted guidance in its OVDI FAQs (#51) whether taxpayers should opt out of…

  • Opting Out of the Offshore Voluntary Compliance Initiative Programs

    As with other IRS’ 2009 and 2011 offshore voluntary compliance initiatives, the 2012 program gives…

Tags: amnestyAsset Protection FBAR foreign account hsbc opt out ovdi OVDP penalties and interest voluntary disclosure
Category: Planning for Tax Minimization

Post navigation

Previous: Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA): More Information Sharing Agreements Expected
Next: IRS Notices for OVDI Program

Related Posts

Top myths of US tax compliance for Foreign Accountholders

There is a lot of misinformation so we decided to…

Read More

IRS Form 3520: How to sign and file the form

We have counseled many clients with the IRS Form 3520…

Read More

A Lesson From Brown v. U.S.: A Defective Tax Refund Filing

The recent case from the U.S. Court of Appeals for…

Read More

Recent Posts

  • The Enforcement Surge: What the DOJ and IRS Campaign Means for Tax Professionals and Their ClientsOctober 17, 2026
  • The High Price of Payroll Tax Non-Compliance: Lessons from United States v. PittsSeptember 15, 2026
  • FBAR Willfulness, Recklessness, and the Excessive Fines Defense: Key Takeaways from United States v. RundSeptember 11, 2026
  • FBAR Enforcement and Penalty Analysis: United States v. NiksichSeptember 5, 2026
  • Billions Offshore, Millions Missed: What TIGTA’s Report Means for FATCA EnforcementSeptember 2, 2026
  • Criminal Tax Enforcement Takes Center Stage: The National Fraud Enforcement Division MemorandumAugust 21, 2026
  • Navigating New Jersey Tobacco and Vapor Excise Tax AuditsAugust 11, 2026
  • Navigating the US Estate Portability Election: Strategic Timing and Compliance Procedures for Form 706July 13, 2026
  • IRS Transitions from First Time Abatement to Automated Penalty Relief: Strategic Impacts for Tax AdvisorsJuly 11, 2026
  • Parag Patel to Present on IRS Foreign Asset Enforcement at the 2026 NATP TaxposiumJuly 9, 2026

Search

Archives

  • October 2026
  • September 2026
  • August 2026
  • July 2026
  • June 2026
  • May 2026
  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • September 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • December 2006
  • July 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • March 2001
  • March 1999
  • February 1998
  • August 1996
  • July 1996

Meta

  • Log in

Categories

  • Estate Planning and Probate
  • Planning for Tax Minimization

Law Firm Attorney WordPress Theme By Themespride