Skip to content
Tax Law Center Blog

Tax Law Center Blog

  • Tax & Foreign Assets
    • Tax Law Services
    • Foreign Asset Planning
  • About
  • Contact Us
Close Button

New Leak of Offshore Accountholders Highlights the Need to Clean Up

5 April, 2016 Parag Patel 0 Comments 1 category

Parag P. Patel, Esq.By Parag P. Patel, Esq. | Updated April 8, 2016

The U.S. Justice Department is reviewing reports about the offshore financial arrangements of global politicians and public figures based on 11.5 million leaked files from Panamanian law firm Mossack Fonseca, a department spokesman said yesterday. The department is determining whether the findings point to evidence of corruption and other violations of U.S. law.

“The U.S. Department of Justice takes very seriously all credible allegations of high level, foreign corruption that might have a link to the United States or the U.S. financial system,” said Peter Carr, spokesman for the Justice Department’s criminal division.

The International Consortium of Investigative Journalists published the investigation based on documents from the Panama-based Mossack Fonseca law firm, which specializes in creating offshore accounts. The “Panama Papers” revealed financial arrangements of tens of thousands of rich and powerful people, including friends of Russian President Vladimir Putin, relatives of the prime ministers of Britain, Iceland and Pakistan, and the president of Ukraine.

The news about the Panama Papers is emerging as the U.S. continues to ramp up efforts to thwart illegal practices involving offshore accounts. Agreements signed with other countries under the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) have cracked open access to bank information previously held in secret in other countries. If a foreign bank refuses to disclose information about account holders required by FATCA, it may be assessed a 30% withholding tax on certain U.S. source payments, whether or not the recipient is a U.S. taxpayer.

In addition, U.S. taxpayers are required to report holdings in foreign banks and other financial institutions for any year in which their total assets exceed $10,000. The FBAR (Report of Financial Bank and Financial Accounts) for the 2015 tax year must be filed by June 30, 2016. Beginning with the 2016 tax year, FBARs must be filed by April 15 to coincide with the income tax filing deadline.

U.S. taxpayers are ALSO required to report holdings in foreign banks and other financial institutions for any year in which their total assets exceed generally $100,000 (there are many other applicable limits) on another Form 8938. The Form 8938 is filed with the normal income tax return filing.

Beware: Punitive penalties (including criminal prosecution) apply in cases of delinquent or non-filing of the aforementioned forms.

Taxpayers who desire to disclose to the US government a foreign account have a choice between the OVDP, and the newer streamlined procedures.  The OVDP remains the safest and most foolproof program, with amnesty even for willful acts. But for those with the right facts, the IRS Streamlined program for non-willful violations is far simpler and much less costly.  The Streamlined programs came with the 2014 improvements to the OVDP, which sparked and renewed interest in cleaning up offshore accounts.

The two programs are mutually exclusive, and a taxpayer must choose between them. The key difference in participating in the streamlined procedures requires a certification of non-willfulness. A false certification filed under the streamlined procedures could lead to possible criminal liability. Most US taxpayers who enter the IRS OVDP to resolve undeclared offshore accounts will pay a penalty equal to 27.5 percent of the high value of the accounts. The IRS updated its list of foreign banks where accounts trigger a 50% (rather than 27.5%) penalty in the IRS’s long-running Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program (OVDP). This penalty is based on the highest account balance measured over up to eight years.

Whether a taxpayer’s conduct is non-willful is a critical question of fact and law, based largely on the taxpayer’s particular facts and circumstances. Taxpayers with foreign accounts would be wise to retain experienced tax legal counsel, to better analyze the taxpayers’ position and recommend one of the two programs to clean up their mess. Most importantly, account holders become ineligible to enter the voluntary disclosure programs after the US government contacts them, which becomes more worrisome in light of leaks like the Panama Papers.

Parag P. Patel, Esq.About the Author

Parag P. Patel, Esq. brings over three decades of experience to individuals and businesses facing complex tax problems. Holding advanced degrees from Georgetown University Law Center (J.D.) and New York University School of Law (LL.M. in Tax Law), the nation’s top tax programs, Mr. Patel delivers sophisticated and creative strategies in complicated federal and state audits, penalty abatements, and foreign asset/income reporting. His practice emphasizes international tax matters, specifically foreign financial account reporting (FBAR), voluntary disclosures, and penalty defense.

Book a Paid Legal Consultation

Related Posts

  • Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA): More Information Sharing Agreements Expected

    FATCA was enacted in 2010 by Congress to target non-compliance by U.S. taxpayers using foreign…

  • New Comments of the IRS' New Streamlined Filing Compliance Procedures for Non-Resident Non-Filer U.S. Taxpayers

    I just returned from the American Bar Association Section of Taxation's annual National Institute on…

  • Swiss Banks' Deadline to Disclose Information is Extended

    The U.S. Department of Justice last Thursday issued a release stating that it extended for…

Tags: amnestyAsset Protection fatca FBAR foreign account hsbc offshore OVDP penalties and interest SDOP SFOP Streamlined Filing Compliance Procedures voluntary disclosure
Category: Planning for Tax Minimization

Post navigation

Previous: Streamlined Filing Compliance Procedure’s New Revisions to Streamlined Domestic Offshore Procedures (SDOP)
Next: How to Respond to an IRS CP3219N Notice of Deficiency (90-day letter)

Related Posts

Form 5471 Penalties Upheld in Latest Court Ruling

The D.C. Circuit handed the IRS a big win last…

Read More

New Escalating Wave of PPP Enforcement: Key Takeaways for New Jersey Employers and Tax Professionals

The enforcement landscape surrounding the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) has…

Read More

The Strange Case of U.S. v. Hughes: Willful and Non-Willful (at the Same Time?)

A recent decision from the District Court of Northern California…

Read More

Recent Posts

  • The Enforcement Surge: What the DOJ and IRS Campaign Means for Tax Professionals and Their ClientsOctober 17, 2026
  • The High Price of Payroll Tax Non-Compliance: Lessons from United States v. PittsSeptember 15, 2026
  • FBAR Willfulness, Recklessness, and the Excessive Fines Defense: Key Takeaways from United States v. RundSeptember 11, 2026
  • FBAR Enforcement and Penalty Analysis: United States v. NiksichSeptember 5, 2026
  • Billions Offshore, Millions Missed: What TIGTA’s Report Means for FATCA EnforcementSeptember 2, 2026
  • Criminal Tax Enforcement Takes Center Stage: The National Fraud Enforcement Division MemorandumAugust 21, 2026
  • Navigating New Jersey Tobacco and Vapor Excise Tax AuditsAugust 11, 2026
  • Navigating the US Estate Portability Election: Strategic Timing and Compliance Procedures for Form 706July 13, 2026
  • IRS Transitions from First Time Abatement to Automated Penalty Relief: Strategic Impacts for Tax AdvisorsJuly 11, 2026
  • Parag Patel to Present on IRS Foreign Asset Enforcement at the 2026 NATP TaxposiumJuly 9, 2026

Search

Archives

  • October 2026
  • September 2026
  • August 2026
  • July 2026
  • June 2026
  • May 2026
  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • September 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • December 2006
  • July 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • March 2001
  • March 1999
  • February 1998
  • August 1996
  • July 1996

Meta

  • Log in

Categories

  • Estate Planning and Probate
  • Planning for Tax Minimization

Law Firm Attorney WordPress Theme By Themespride