Skip to content
Tax Law Center Blog

Tax Law Center Blog

  • Tax & Foreign Assets
    • Tax Law Services
    • Foreign Asset Planning
  • About
  • Contact Us
Close Button

IRS’s four offshore programs have netted 39,000 taxpayers and over $5.5 billion

6 May, 2013 Parag Patel 0 Comments 1 category

Parag P. Patel, Esq.By Parag P. Patel, Esq. | Updated May 6, 2013

The Internal Revenue Service has collected over $5.5 billion in revenue from taxpayers who came forward and reported on their foreign holdings under its Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Programs, but it could be missing billions more in revenue from tax evaders, according to a new report.

The report, issued by the Government Accountability Office, found that as of December 2012, the IRS’s four offshore programs have resulted in more than 39,000 disclosures by taxpayers, producing over $5.5 billion in revenue. The offshore disclosure programs attract taxpayers by offering a reduced risk of criminal prosecution and lower penalties than if the unreported income was discovered by one of IRS’s other enforcement programs.

Tax evasion by individuals with unreported offshore financial accounts was estimated by one IRS commissioner to amount to several tens of billions of dollars, but no precise figure exists. The IRS has operated four offshore programs since 2003 that offered incentives for taxpayers to disclose their offshore accounts and pay delinquent taxes, interest and penalties.

For the 2009 Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program, nearly all the program participants received the standard offshore penalty of 20 percent of the highest aggregate value of the accounts, meaning the account value was greater than $75,000 and taxpayers used the accounts (that is, made deposits or withdrawals) during the period under review.

The median account balance of the more than 10,000 cases closed so far from the 2009 OVDP was $570,000. Participant cases with offshore penalties greater than $1 million represented about 6 percent of all the 2009 OVDP cases, but accounted for almost half of all offshore penalties.

Taxpayers from these cases disclosed a variety of reasons for having offshore accounts. More than half of them had accounts at the Swiss bank UBS, which signed a deferred prosecution agreement in 2009 with the IRS under which it agreed to pay $780 million in fines, penalties, interest and restitution and later agreed to turn over thousands of names of its U.S. account holders.

Using 2009 OVDP data, the IRS identified bank names and account locations that helped it pursue additional noncompliance. Based on a review of the cases, the GAO found examples of immigrants who stated in their 2009 OVDP applications that they were unaware of their offshore reporting requirements. IRS officials from the Offshore Compliance Initiative office said they have not targeted outreach efforts to new immigrants. Using information from the 2009 OVDP, such as the characteristics of taxpayers who were not aware of their reporting requirements, to increase education and outreach to those populations could promote voluntary compliance, the GAO noted.

The IRS has detected some taxpayers with previously undisclosed offshore accounts who were attempting to circumvent paying the taxes, interest and penalties that would otherwise be owed, but based on GAO reviews of IRS data, the IRS may be missing attempts by other taxpayers attempting to do so.

The GAO analyzed amended returns filed for tax year 2003 through tax year 2008, matched them to other information available to the IRS about taxpayers’ possible offshore activities, and found many more potential quiet disclosures than IRS detected. In addition, the IRS has not researched whether sharp increases in taxpayers reporting offshore accounts for the first time is due to efforts to circumvent the money owed, thereby missing opportunities to help ensure compliance.

From tax years 2007 through 2010, the IRS estimated that the number of taxpayers reporting foreign accounts nearly doubled to 516,000. Taxpayer attempts to circumvent taxes, interest and penalties by not participating in an offshore program, but instead by simply amending past returns or reporting on their current returns previously unreported offshore accounts, result in lost revenues and undermine the programs’ effectiveness, according to the GAO.

Among other suggestions, the GAO recommended that IRS use its offshore data to identify and educate taxpayers who might not be aware of their reporting requirements. The IRS should also explore options for using a methodology to detect and pursue quiet disclosures more effectively and implement the best option. The GAO also suggested that the IRS analyze first-time offshore account reporting trends to identify possible attempts to circumvent monies owed and take action to help ensure compliance.

The IRS agreed with all of the GAO recommendations. “Global tax enforcement is a top priority at IRS, and we have made significant progress on multiple fronts, including ground-breaking international tax agreements and increased cooperation with other governments,” wrote IRS Acting Commissioner Steven T. Miller in response to the report. “In addition, the IRS and the Justice Department have increased efforts regarding criminal investigation of international tax evasion. This combination of efforts helped support the 2009 Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program (2009 OVDP), the 2011 Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Initiative (OVDI) and the ongoing 2012 Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program (2012 OVDP). The goal of these programs is to get individuals back into the U.S. tax system and to turn the tide against offshore tax evasion.”

Patel Law Offices has consulted with hundreds of clients regarding their offshore compliance issues. Patel Law Offices is a law firm dedicated to helping clients resolve complicated tax, criminal tax, and international tax problems. Our firm assists (and defends) clients and their advisors to legally disclose (and legitimize) foreign accounts.

Parag P. Patel, Esq.About the Author

Parag P. Patel, Esq. brings over three decades of experience to individuals and businesses facing complex tax problems. Holding advanced degrees from Georgetown University Law Center (J.D.) and New York University School of Law (LL.M. in Tax Law), the nation’s top tax programs, Mr. Patel delivers sophisticated and creative strategies in complicated federal and state audits, penalty abatements, and foreign asset/income reporting. His practice emphasizes international tax matters, specifically foreign financial account reporting (FBAR), voluntary disclosures, and penalty defense.

Book a Paid Legal Consultation

Related Posts

  • Finally. Government Accountability Office makes recommendations to the IRS for tax laws education to immigrants

    In latest report from a government watchdog agency called the Government Accountability Office (GAO) the GAO makes recommendations to…

  • The Foreign Gift Penalty Trap

    The IRS’s Inflexible Stance Discourages Good Faith Compliance The requirement for U.S. persons to report…

  • Government Report Advises IRS to Increase Awareness of Offshore Account Rules to Help Immigrants

    The Internal Revenue Service’s four amnesty programs for those who have undeclared offshore accounts have…

Tags: amnestyAsset Protection FBAR foreign account offshore accounts opt out OVDP penalties and interest voluntary disclosure
Category: Planning for Tax Minimization

Post navigation

Previous: Government Report Advises IRS to Increase Awareness of Offshore Account Rules to Help Immigrants
Next: Mobility of Estate Plan Documents

Related Posts

Parag Patel Esq. Speaks at Annual Convention of New Jersey Society of Certified Public Accountants

Parag Patel Esq. will be a featured speaker at the…

Read More

Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act – Traps for the Unwary

For anyone who has clients or family members that live…

Read More

Parag Patel Speaks at 2026 NJCPA Convention: Navigating the High Stakes of Criminal Tax

The intersection of civil tax compliance and criminal tax exposure…

Read More

Recent Posts

  • The Enforcement Surge: What the DOJ and IRS Campaign Means for Tax Professionals and Their ClientsOctober 17, 2026
  • The High Price of Payroll Tax Non-Compliance: Lessons from United States v. PittsSeptember 15, 2026
  • FBAR Willfulness, Recklessness, and the Excessive Fines Defense: Key Takeaways from United States v. RundSeptember 11, 2026
  • FBAR Enforcement and Penalty Analysis: United States v. NiksichSeptember 5, 2026
  • Billions Offshore, Millions Missed: What TIGTA’s Report Means for FATCA EnforcementSeptember 2, 2026
  • Criminal Tax Enforcement Takes Center Stage: The National Fraud Enforcement Division MemorandumAugust 21, 2026
  • Navigating New Jersey Tobacco and Vapor Excise Tax AuditsAugust 11, 2026
  • Navigating the US Estate Portability Election: Strategic Timing and Compliance Procedures for Form 706July 13, 2026
  • IRS Transitions from First Time Abatement to Automated Penalty Relief: Strategic Impacts for Tax AdvisorsJuly 11, 2026
  • Parag Patel to Present on IRS Foreign Asset Enforcement at the 2026 NATP TaxposiumJuly 9, 2026

Search

Archives

  • October 2026
  • September 2026
  • August 2026
  • July 2026
  • June 2026
  • May 2026
  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • September 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • December 2006
  • July 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • March 2001
  • March 1999
  • February 1998
  • August 1996
  • July 1996

Meta

  • Log in

Categories

  • Estate Planning and Probate
  • Planning for Tax Minimization

Law Firm Attorney WordPress Theme By Themespride