Skip to content
Tax Law Center Blog

Tax Law Center Blog

  • Tax & Foreign Assets
    • Tax Law Services
    • Foreign Asset Planning
  • About
  • Contact Us
Close Button

U.S. Taxpayers at New Risk of Audit from OVDP Declines and Withdrawals Campaign

19 June, 2017 Parag Patel 0 Comments 1 category

Parag P. Patel, Esq.By Parag P. Patel, Esq. | Updated June 19, 2017

Last year, the US Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA) released a report which assessed how well that IRS was managing the Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program (OVDP). OVDP is one of the programs taxpayers may use to become compliant if they previously had failed to report offshore income on their tax returns and file Reports of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (FBARs).

One of TIGTAs findings was that the IRS had not followed up on a number of non-compliant taxpayers who requested participation in OVDP, but were either denied access or withdrew from OVDP. TIGTA believes that a significant portion of these taxpayers may still be non-compliant. Their recommendation was that the IRS should review denied or withdrawn OVDP applications for potential FBAR penalty assessments and potential criminal investigation.

In response, the IRS Large Business and International Division recently rolled out a compliance campaign specifically targeted against certain unsuccessful applicants of the Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program (OVDP). The purpose of this campaign is to address the potential noncompliance of applicants who initially applied for entry into the OVDP since 2009, but were either (i) denied entry by IRS Criminal Investigation division, or (ii) withdrew prior to formal acceptance (defined by acceptance by the IRS of the applicant’s voluntary disclosure letter (sometimes referred to as “pre-acceptance letter”) into the OVDP.

Targeted Taxpayers

The IRS has stated they anticipate that about 6,000 taxpayers may be affected by this campaign. The LB&I will be looking at two specific groups for non-compliance:

  1. Those taxpayers who applied to OVDP, but were denied access to the program by Criminal Investigations, and
  2. Those taxpayers who withdrew from OVDP, of their own accord, before they were accepted into the program. Formal withdrawal by the taxpayer in writing is not required; it is sufficient that a taxpayer did not complete their submission for withdrawal to exist.

To locate taxpayers for this campaign, the IRS will be reviewing taxpayer identification numbers (TINs), addresses and other identifying information provided on pre-clearance applications and Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Letters. Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) reporting is not expected to be a source of identification at this time. According to the Service, a taxpayer’s current residence will not be a factor when choosing the targets of the OVDP compliance campaign.  Hence, as part of the campaign, the IRS will include U.S. taxpayers residing overseas as well as those in the U.S.

Possible Next Steps for Targeted Taxpayers

For those targeted taxpayers who are selected, there are three possible IRS treatments:

  1. No further action for taxpayers who have become compliant.
  2. “Soft” notices from the IRS outlining taxpayer’s options, and requiring taxpayer response in cases of immaterial noncompliance. This letter will be sent by the IRS to taxpayers whose non-compliance is considered immaterial. The IRS has not defined a threshold level for immateriality, only that it will be facts and circumstances based. If the taxpayer receives a soft letter, the IRS will list a number of options to resolve the taxpayer’s non-compliance, requiring a response from the taxpayer.
  3. Examination (audit) by the IRS for noncompliant taxpayers. While the focus of the examination will be on offshore income and assets, the taxpayer’s entire federal tax return will be subject to review as part of a regular exam. Also, depending on the situation, multiple years may be involved, potentially going back to 2009. Finally, the risk of the examining agent making a referral to Criminal Investigations exists as a potential outcome.

Taxpayers who may be at risk of an examination as a result of the IRS’ OVDP Declines-Withdrawal Campaign no longer have OVDP as an option for full-compliance. However, prior to being selected for examination, taxpayers can still become compliant by amending and filing all required returns and making payment for all taxes, interest, and penalties.

Taxpayers who were denied entry by IRS Criminal Investigation division or withdrew after submitting an application to the OVDP are encouraged to seek legal counsel to ensure that all open years are in compliance and that compliance can be proven. Taxpayers who have otherwise yet to resolve their offshore noncompliance are encouraged to seek legal counsel and consider entering the OVDP or other treatment programs currently available.

Parag P. Patel, Esq.About the Author

Parag P. Patel, Esq. brings over three decades of experience to individuals and businesses facing complex tax problems. Holding advanced degrees from Georgetown University Law Center (J.D.) and New York University School of Law (LL.M. in Tax Law), the nation’s top tax programs, Mr. Patel delivers sophisticated and creative strategies in complicated federal and state audits, penalty abatements, and foreign asset/income reporting. His practice emphasizes international tax matters, specifically foreign financial account reporting (FBAR), voluntary disclosures, and penalty defense.

Book a Paid Legal Consultation

Related Posts

  • Beware IRS Letter 6291

    Many of our clients have recently received IRS Letter 6291, which begins with Why We’re…

  • The Dreaded IRS Letter 6185: "We received information that you have a foreign account"

    Many of our clients have recently received IRS Letter 6185, which begins with "Why we're…

  • IRS Announces new OVDP Declines-Withdrawals Campaign

    Earlier this month, the IRS' Large Business and International division released its list of 13…

Tags: FBARforeign account opt out OVDP Streamlined Filing Compliance Procedures voluntary disclosure
Category: Planning for Tax Minimization

Post navigation

Previous: FATCA Noncompliant Accounts may be Frozen or Blocked
Next: New IRS practice unit: “Substantial compliance” doctrine, international information return penalties

Related Posts

US FATCA Enforcement Softens due to Coronavirus

The Internal Revenue Service is giving foreign banks and financial…

Read More

India issues FATCA Self-certifications and KYC Warnings

The Government of India continues to crackdown on self-certifications and…

Read More

Do Inherited Foreign Assets Receive a Step-up in Cost Basis for U.S. Tax Purposes?

A common question asked by clients when receiving an inheritance…

Read More

Recent Posts

  • The Enforcement Surge: What the DOJ and IRS Campaign Means for Tax Professionals and Their ClientsOctober 17, 2026
  • The High Price of Payroll Tax Non-Compliance: Lessons from United States v. PittsSeptember 15, 2026
  • FBAR Willfulness, Recklessness, and the Excessive Fines Defense: Key Takeaways from United States v. RundSeptember 11, 2026
  • FBAR Enforcement and Penalty Analysis: United States v. NiksichSeptember 5, 2026
  • Billions Offshore, Millions Missed: What TIGTA’s Report Means for FATCA EnforcementSeptember 2, 2026
  • Criminal Tax Enforcement Takes Center Stage: The National Fraud Enforcement Division MemorandumAugust 21, 2026
  • Navigating New Jersey Tobacco and Vapor Excise Tax AuditsAugust 11, 2026
  • Navigating the US Estate Portability Election: Strategic Timing and Compliance Procedures for Form 706July 13, 2026
  • IRS Transitions from First Time Abatement to Automated Penalty Relief: Strategic Impacts for Tax AdvisorsJuly 11, 2026
  • Parag Patel to Present on IRS Foreign Asset Enforcement at the 2026 NATP TaxposiumJuly 9, 2026

Search

Archives

  • October 2026
  • September 2026
  • August 2026
  • July 2026
  • June 2026
  • May 2026
  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • September 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • December 2006
  • July 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • March 2001
  • March 1999
  • February 1998
  • August 1996
  • July 1996

Meta

  • Log in

Categories

  • Estate Planning and Probate
  • Planning for Tax Minimization

Law Firm Attorney WordPress Theme By Themespride